Cedar Park, Texas
Area Profile
78,301 residents. Public schools, jobs, income, housing cost, climate and natural-hazard risk for Cedar Park, in Williamson County.
Cedar Park ranks in the top 7% of published city profiles for employment opportunity, with unemployment at 3.9% and median household income of $129,545.
Rent takes 17% of median household income here, below the 30% threshold conventionally called cost-burdened, and the median home is 4.0 times that income.
Natural-hazard exposure is lower than in most comparable published city profiles, placing Cedar Park in the top 18% for physical resilience.
These sentences are written by fixed rules from the measurements below — a statement appears because a number crossed a stated threshold, and the values behind it are stored with it. No figure anywhere on this site is invented, estimated or inferred to fill a gap. How this works.
At a glance
Jobs & opportunity
Unemployment of 3.9% is lower than 66% of the 3,904 measured US cities.
Employment grew 0.3% over the past year, to 44,740 employed residents.
56% of adults hold a four-year degree, higher than 91% of measured US cities.
Median household income of $129,545 is higher than at least 92% of measured US cities.
| Metric | Value | Compared nationally | Source period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median household income ±$10,860 | $129,545 | Top 8%of 29,463 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Per capita income ±$2,500 | $57,496 | Top 11%of 31,420 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Poverty rate | 5.9% | Bottom 28%of 31,900 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Average commute | 27.2 min | Top 48%of 31,543 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 55.6% | Top 9%of 31,919 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Employment | 44,740 | Bottom 48%of 3,904 | June 2026 |
| Employment change (3 years) | 4.1% | Top 9%of 3,903 | June 2026 |
| Employment change (year over year) | 0.3% | Top 25%of 3,904 | June 2026 |
| Labor force | 46,576 | Bottom 48%of 3,904 | June 2026 |
| Labor force participation | 70.9% | Top 16%of 31,933 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Mean annual wage | $74,580 | Top 30%of 3,658 | 2025 OEWS |
| Median annual wage | $56,950 | Top 29%of 3,658 | 2025 OEWS |
| Unemployment change (year over year) | 0.4% | Top 36%of 3,904 | June 2026 |
| Unemployment rate | 3.9% | Bottom 34%of 3,904 | June 2026 |
| Occupation | People employed | Median annual wage |
|---|---|---|
| General and Operations Managers | 42,190 | $117,850 |
| Fast Food and Counter Workers | 35,000 | $29,310 |
| Customer Service Representatives | 32,690 | $43,720 |
| Software Developers | 31,960 | $134,120 |
| Retail Salespersons | 29,660 | $33,860 |
| Stockers and Order Fillers | 27,430 | $37,720 |
Occupational employment and wages are published for metropolitan areas rather than for individual cities or ZIP areas, so these describe the wider labor market this location sits in. 2025 OEWS, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Schools
How it’s calculated →48% of students met the state standard in mathematics and 53% in reading, across the schools here that reported results.
There are 13.9 students for every full-time teacher across 18 public schools, fewer than in most measured places.
| School | District | Students | Per teacher | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VISTA RIDGE H S | LEANDER ISD | 2,480 | 15.4 | — | — |
| CEDAR PARK H S | LEANDER ISD | 2,155 | 15.4 | — | — |
| CEDAR PARK MIDDLE | LEANDER ISD | 1,365 | 15.9 | 62% | 72% |
| ARTIE L HENRY MIDDLE | LEANDER ISD | 1,347 | 14.5 | 63% | 57% |
| RUNNING BRUSHY MIDDLE | LEANDER ISD | 1,120 | 12.7 | 62% | 52% |
| BASIS CEDAR PARK PRI · charter | BASIS TEXAS | 859 | 17.2 | — | — |
| RONALD REAGAN EL | LEANDER ISD | 800 | 13.8 | 51% | 57% |
| C C MASON EL | LEANDER ISD | 691 | 13.8 | 34% | 44% |
| PATRICIA KNOWLES EL | LEANDER ISD | 683 | 10.7 | 22% | 30% |
| OFFICER LEONARD A REED EL | LEANDER ISD | 638 | 11.0 | 41% | 43% |
| DEER CREEK EL | LEANDER ISD | 638 | 14.5 | 45% | 58% |
| CHARLOTTE COX EL | LEANDER ISD | 534 | 11.9 | 39% | 42% |
18.1% of students here are eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. That describes the circumstances families arrive with rather than how the schools perform, which is why AreaProfile shows it and does not score it.
Public schools only, from the NCES Common Core of Data. Schools are placed by ZIP code, so this is which schools are in this place rather than which one a particular address is zoned for — district boundaries do not follow municipal ones, and enrollment zones change. Fully virtual schools are excluded: they enroll students from across the state while reporting one administrative address, and counting them here would describe a school population this place does not have. The assessment covers grades 3 through 8, so a high school shows no proficiency figure — a dash in those columns means the test was not given at that school, not that it performed badly. Proficiency is measured against Texas’s own standard, so it compares cleanly within the state and only broadly against other states; AreaProfile therefore ranks it within state. The directory is current, while the proficiency figures are from the last school year with national coverage before the pandemic interrupted testing.
Housing & affordability
How it’s calculated →Prices for everything a household buys run about 2% below the national average — the Bureau of Economic Analysis index reads 98.3, against 100 for the nation. Housing drives most of that difference.
A new two-bedroom lease runs about $1,852, close to the $1,846 tenants already here pay.
Median rent of $1,846 takes 17% of median household income, below the 30% threshold at which a household is considered cost-burdened.
A median home at $513,600 costs 4.0 times the median household income of $129,545, above the historic benchmark of about three times income.
Prices here run about 2% below the national average. The spread between places is driven mostly by housing — goods vary far less — and this excludes taxes.
| Metric | Value | Compared nationally | Source period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of living index | 98.3 | Bottom 39%of 3,658 | 2023 |
| Home price to income | 3.96 | Top 27%of 27,972 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Homeownership rate | 66.7% | Bottom 31%of 31,717 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Housing units ±700 | 29,364 | Top 2%of 32,177 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Market rent, one bedroom | $1,562 | Top 40%of 4,067 | FY2026 |
| Market rent, three bedroom | $2,347 | Top 42%of 4,067 | FY2026 |
| Market rent, two bedroom | $1,852 | Top 40%of 4,067 | FY2026 |
| Median gross rent ±$55 | $1,846 | Top 11%of 23,329 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Median home value ±$21,126 | $513,600 | Top 11%of 29,342 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Rent as a share of income | 17.1% | Bottom 39%of 22,804 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | Bottom 15%of 31,872 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
Both affordability measures come from the same ACS release as the income they are compared with, so the comparison is like for like. They describe housing cost against local earnings and are not a cost-of-living index — transport, groceries, healthcare, insurance and taxes are not included, and a place can look affordable here and still be expensive to live in for reasons this does not capture.
Growth & development
How it’s calculated →An AreaProfile calculation combining permit volume per resident, its direction over one and three years, population change and employment growth. Permit volume alone is not the measure.
Population has been broadly flat since 2020, at 78,380 in 2024.
Permitting has turned downward after moving the other way the year before: 0 units authorized in 2025, 100% below the year before.
New construction is predominantly single-family: of 6 units permitted over the past twelve months, none were in buildings of five or more homes.
At 0.1 permitted units per 1,000 residents, building activity is below the median for measured US cities.
Weather & climate
6 of the twelve months have a normal average temperature between 55°F and 80°F. July averages a high of 97°F and January a low of 42°F.
Normal annual precipitation is 36.3 inches.
| Metric | Value | Source period |
|---|---|---|
| Annual precipitation | 36.3" | 1991-2020 Normals |
| Annual snowfall | 0.2" | 1991-2020 Normals |
| Average January low | 42°F | 1991-2020 Normals |
| Average July high | 97°F | 1991-2020 Normals |
| Comfortable months | 6 | 1991-2020 Normals |
| Seasonal temperature swing | 34°F | 1991-2020 Normals |
Climate figures are thirty-year normals, not current conditions. They describe what a typical year looks like rather than what the weather is doing today.
Physical risk
The hazards accounting for most of this area's expected annual loss are hail and wildfire.
Low or minimal exposure: tornado, cold wave, winter weather, inland flooding, heat wave, lightning, ice storm, hurricane, drought, strong wind, earthquake, landslide.
Hazard ratings are AreaProfile calculations derived from the FEMA National Risk Index v1.20.0 (December 2025). FEMA publishes at county level. City values are the population-weighted mean of the counties the city overlaps, using AreaProfile place-to-county land-area weights. FEMA does not endorse this presentation. Higher physical resilience means lower exposure.
Safety
How it’s measured →Below these are deaths rather than offenses, published for the county. The two measure different things and are not comparable with each other.
Cedar Park's police department reported 89 violent offenses per 100,000 residents, lower than most places with a department reporting. Property crime runs at 1,223.
Williamson County records 3.7 homicide deaths per 100,000 residents a year, near the middle of counties measured. The CDC does not publish this below county level.
Firearm deaths of all intents run at 12.3 per 100,000 — more than the homicide rate, because nationally most firearm deaths are suicides.
Drug overdose deaths run at 8.7 per 100,000 residents in Williamson County.
Firearm deaths count every intent together, and nationally the majority are suicides rather than homicides. The two columns overlap and should not be added.
Offenses are reported to the FBI by Cedar Park’s own police department, for the population it serves, and are shown only where it reported every month of the year — a partial year is withheld rather than scaled up. Reported crime counts what was reported to and recorded by police, which is not the same as what happened, and a place that draws a large daytime workforce carries incidents its residents did not generate. Age-adjusted rates from provisional death certificate records, published by the CDC for Williamson County as a whole — these rates are not published below county level. A county can hold both a dense city center and a quiet suburb whose experience of it is nothing alike, so this describes the county around Cedar Park rather than Cedar Park itself. That is why AreaProfile shows these figures and does not put them in the Area Score. Where fewer than ten deaths were recorded the count is suppressed at source, and a rate built on single figures moves sharply between releases. What this measure has that reported crime does not: a death certificate is filed whether or not the local police agency submitted a return that year, so the figures stay comparable between places and over time.
What this profile does not cover
Some things people look for are not on this page, and each is absent for a reason rather than by oversight. The Area Score is calculated without them and the weighting is documented on the methodology page.
- Taxes
- Taxes are not published: no source covers them nationally with a method open enough to check. Cost of living now is — the index above is the Bureau of Economic Analysis price parity for this area — but it is a price level for all consumption rather than a budget for a household, its spread is driven mostly by housing, and it excludes taxes. Housing affordability is computed separately from rent, price and income, because that answers a narrower and more actionable question. Nothing here is individualized tax advice.
- Anything about a specific address
- Every figure describes an area, not a street or a house. School attendance zones, insurance pricing and the character of a neighborhood all vary within the places measured here.
Access
3 major airports lie within 100 miles, the nearest Austin-Bergstrom Intl at 24 miles.
| Airport | Code | Distance | Longest runway |
|---|---|---|---|
| Austin-Bergstrom Intl | AUS | 24 mi | 12,250 ft |
| San Antonio Intl | SAT | 78 mi | 8,505 ft |
| Tstc Waco | CNW | 90 mi | 8,600 ft |
Airport identity, position and runway data come from the FAA. “Major airport” is an AreaProfile classification — a public-use civil airport with a paved runway of at least 8,000 feet — not an FAA hub designation. Distances are straight-line, not driving distance.
Customize your score
What matters to you?
Choose what you weight most heavily. Nothing is saved to an account — your preferences stay in this browser, and the Area Score never changes.
Select one or more priorities to see how this location scores against them.
Other cities in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX
Same metropolitan area, measured the same way| City | County | Population | Area Score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin | Travis County | 979,539 | 69 | vs Cedar Park |
| Round Rock | Williamson County | 127,786 | 73 | vs Cedar Park |
| Georgetown | Williamson County | 85,999 | 72 | vs Cedar Park |
| Leander | Travis County | 74,067 | 79 | vs Cedar Park |
| San Marcos | Hays County | 70,897 | 57 | vs Cedar Park |
| Pflugerville | Travis County | 65,971 | 75 | vs Cedar Park |
| Kyle | Hays County | 56,823 | 70 | vs Cedar Park |
| Hutto | Williamson County | 35,483 | 75 | vs Cedar Park |
| Brushy Creek | Williamson County | 19,576 | — | vs Cedar Park |
| Lakeway | Travis County | 19,307 | 73 | vs Cedar Park |
| Steiner Ranch | Travis County | 18,619 | — | vs Cedar Park |
| Manor | Travis County | 18,603 | 68 | vs Cedar Park |
Every city here is measured on the same scale from the same source releases, so the comparison is like for like. A higher Area Score reflects AreaProfile’s standardized weighting rather than a judgment about which is the better place to live.
Similar places
Matched on AreaProfile signals, not geographyCompare
Put Cedar Park side by side with a similar place.
Data & methodology
| Used for | Source | Source period | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access | Federal Aviation Administration Airports (NASR) — Aeronautical Data Delivery Service | NASR current cycle | 28-day NASR cycle |
| Safety | Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime Data Explorer Summarized offense counts by law enforcement agency | 2025 calendar year | Annually, with monthly revisions |
| Physical risk | Federal Emergency Management Agency National Risk Index | National Risk Index December 2025 (v1.20.0) | Periodic dataset versions (v1.20.0 current) |
| Climate | NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information U.S. Climate Normals 1991–2020 (Monthly) | 1991-2020 Normals | Every ten years (next release follows the 2001–2030 period) |
| Housing | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional price parities and county personal income | 2023 | Annually, each December |
| Jobs | U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics | June 2026 | Monthly |
| Jobs | U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics | 2025 OEWS | Annual (spring release) |
| Demographics, Housing, Income, Jobs | U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (Table-Based Summary File) | 2024 ACS 5-Year | Annual (5-year estimates released each December) |
| Development | U.S. Census Bureau Building Permits Survey | 12 months ending July 2026 | Monthly, roughly three weeks after the reference month |
| Demographics | U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program | July 1, 2024 estimate | Annual (vintage released each spring) |
| Safety | U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics Provisional county-level mortality by intent | April 2025 to March 2026 | Quarterly, with a rolling twelve-month window alongside complete calendar years |
| Schools | U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics Common Core of Data and EDFacts assessments | 2019-20 school year; 2024-25 school year | Directory annually; assessment results as EDFacts releases them |
| Housing | U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research Fair Market Rents | FY2026 | Annually, each October for the coming fiscal year |
Profile recalculated August 30, 2026. Recalculation is not the same as new source data — each figure above shows the period its source actually covers. Read the full methodology or browse every source.
ZIP codes in Cedar Park
1 published ZIP profiles| ZIP | Population | Median household income | Area Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 78613 | 89,956 | $125,487 | 75 |