AreaProfile

North Auburn, California

Area Profile

13,480 residents. Public schools, jobs, income, housing cost, climate and natural-hazard risk for North Auburn, in Placer County.

Area Score unavailable

Missing required signal: growth. AreaProfile withholds a score rather than inferring the missing dimensions.

How we calculate this

How this area ranks
OpportunityTop 50% of 3,904 published cities56
Housing affordability4087th of 4,223 published cities37
ClimateTop 27% of 4,223 published cities76
Physical resilience2756th of 4,182 published cities44
Access2454th of 4,226 published cities90
Economic stability3082nd of 4,226 published cities47
The quick read

Unemployment is 4.2% and median household income $71,056, putting employment conditions in the middle range of published city profiles.

Buying strains local incomes far more than renting does — the median home is 7.5 times median household income, against a historic benchmark near three — while rent takes 29% of it.

A typical July reaches 93°F and a typical January falls to 38°F, on thirty-year normals.

At a glance

Population
13,480
2024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income
$71,056
Top 44% nationally
Density
1,731/sq mi
7.8 sq mi of land
Median age
45.5
2024 ACS 5-Year
County
Placer County
California
Metro area
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA
Nearest major airport
MCC
25 mi · Mc Clellan Airfield
Median home value
$530,400
2024 ACS 5-Year

Jobs & opportunity

Unemployment of 4.2% is lower than 55% of the 3,904 measured US cities.

Employment fell 1.4% over the past year, to 197,620 employed residents.

MetricValueCompared with peersSource period
Median household income ±$9,057$71,056Top 44%2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income ±$4,505$42,607Top 27%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate11.1%Top 49%2024 ACS 5-Year
Average commute27.8 minTop 44%2024 ACS 5-Year
Bachelor's degree or higher24.7%Top 40%2024 ACS 5-Year
Employment197,620Top 29%June 2026
Employment change (3 years)2.5%Top 18%June 2026
Employment change (year over year)-1.4%Bottom 36%June 2026
Labor force206,307Top 29%June 2026
Labor force participation53.9%Bottom 30%2024 ACS 5-Year
Mean annual wage$77,150Top 25%2025 OEWS
Median annual wage$59,750Top 21%2025 OEWS
Unemployment change (year over year)-0.2%Bottom 35%June 2026
Unemployment rate4.2%Bottom 45%June 2026
Median household income, successive ACS releases
202120222023202474k71k
Each point is a separate five-year estimate, most recently $71,056 in the 2024 ACS 5-Year. Consecutive releases share four years of sample, so AreaProfile shows them as a record of successive estimates and does not compute a year-over-year change from them.
Largest occupations — Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA
OccupationPeople employedMedian annual wage
Home Health and Personal Care Aides60,350$34,320
Management Analysts25,600$82,990
Fast Food and Counter Workers24,910$42,860
Registered Nurses23,590$171,460
Retail Salespersons22,970$38,100
Office Clerks, General21,340$48,940

Occupational employment and wages are published for metropolitan areas rather than for individual cities or ZIP areas, so these describe the wider labor market this location sits in. 2025 OEWS, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes city-level labor data only for places of 25,000 or more. This is the figure for Placer County, CA, which contains this city.

Housing & affordability

How it’s calculated →

Median rent of $1,742 takes 29% of median household income, below the 30% threshold at which a household is considered cost-burdened.

A median home costs 7.5 times median household income here, well above the historic benchmark, at a level conventionally described as seriously unaffordable.

Rent as a share of income
29.4%
Below the 30% cost-burdened threshold
Home price to income
7.5×
median home value ÷ median income
Median gross rent
$1,742
2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value
$530,400
2024 ACS 5-Year
MetricValueCompared with peersSource period
Home price to income7.46Top 4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Homeownership rate64.2%Bottom 27%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units ±3885,672Top 10%2024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent ±$93$1,742Top 14%2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value ±$50,390$530,400Top 11%2024 ACS 5-Year
Rent as a share of income29.4%Top 7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Vacancy rate6.0%Bottom 33%2024 ACS 5-Year

Both affordability measures come from the same ACS release as the income they are compared with, so the comparison is like for like. They describe housing cost against local earnings and are not a cost-of-living index — transport, groceries, healthcare, insurance and taxes are not included, and a place can look affordable here and still be expensive to live in for reasons this does not capture.

Growth & development

How it’s calculated →

No building-permit activity is published for this location by the Census Building Permits Survey.

Weather & climate

7 of the twelve months have a normal average temperature between 55°F and 80°F. July averages a high of 93°F and January a low of 38°F.

Normal annual precipitation is 36.1 inches.

30°50°70°90°JFMAMJJASOND
Solid line: normal daily high. Dashed line: normal daily low. 1991-2020 normals from NOAA station AUBURN, 1.6 miles from this location.
Precipitation
JFMAMJJASOND7.0"
Normal monthly precipitation, in inches.
MetricValueSource period
Annual precipitation36.1"1991-2020 Normals
Average January low38°F1991-2020 Normals
Average July high93°F1991-2020 Normals
Comfortable months71991-2020 Normals
Seasonal temperature swing32°F1991-2020 Normals

Climate figures are thirty-year normals, not current conditions. They describe what a typical year looks like rather than what the weather is doing today.

Physical risk

44 / 100
Physical resilience

The hazards accounting for most of this area's expected annual loss are inland flooding, wildfire and earthquake.

WildfireHigh
AvalancheModerate
Inland floodingModerate
EarthquakeHigh
DroughtModerate
Heat waveModerate

Low or minimal exposure: landslide, lightning, volcanic activity, winter weather, hail, tornado, strong wind.

Hazard ratings are AreaProfile calculations derived from the FEMA National Risk Index v1.20.0 (December 2025). FEMA publishes at county level. City values are the population-weighted mean of the counties the city overlaps, using AreaProfile place-to-county land-area weights. FEMA does not endorse this presentation. Higher physical resilience means lower exposure.

What this profile does not cover

Three things people look for are missing from every AreaProfile page, and each is missing for a reason rather than by oversight. The Area Score is calculated without them and the weighting is documented on the methodology page.

Crime
The FBI’s Crime Data Explorer is the only source with national coverage and a published method, and it requires an API key AreaProfile does not hold. Arrest counts, news volume and commercial “safety scores” are not substituted in the meantime. Reported crime is also easy to misread: agency participation varies year to year, and a city that draws a large daytime workforce carries incidents its residents did not generate.
Taxes
No tax dataset has met the source admission test for coverage, transparent methodology and update cadence. Nothing here is individualized tax advice.
Full cost of living
No public source publishes one with national coverage and a documented method. Housing affordability above is computed from published rent, price and income, and excludes transport, groceries, healthcare, insurance and taxes — commuting cost in particular tends to offset suburban housing savings.

Access

6 major airports lie within 100 miles, the nearest 25 miles away.

AirportCodeDistanceLongest runway
Mc Clellan AirfieldMCC25 mi10,599 ft
Sacramento IntlSMF32 mi8,605 ft
Lake TahoeTVL58 mi8,541 ft

Airport identity, position and runway data come from the FAA. “Major airport” is an AreaProfile classification — a public-use civil airport with a paved runway of at least 8,000 feet — not an FAA hub designation. Distances are straight-line, not driving distance.

Customize your score

What matters to you?

Choose what you weight most heavily. Nothing is saved to an account — your preferences stay in this browser, and the Area Score never changes.

Area Score
Your Score

Select one or more priorities to see how this location scores against them.

Other cities in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA

Same metropolitan area, measured the same way
CityCountyPopulationArea ScoreCompare
SacramentoSacramento County528,70664vs North Auburn
Elk GroveSacramento County179,15568vs North Auburn
RosevillePlacer County155,95565vs North Auburn
Arden-ArcadeSacramento County94,994vs North Auburn
Citrus HeightsSacramento County86,99561vs North Auburn
FolsomSacramento County83,91671vs North Auburn
Rancho CordovaSacramento County81,84967vs North Auburn
CarmichaelSacramento County76,948vs North Auburn
RocklinPlacer County73,32768vs North Auburn
DavisYolo County66,97852vs North Auburn
WoodlandYolo County61,85452vs North Auburn
West SacramentoYolo County54,92760vs North Auburn

Every city here is measured on the same scale from the same source releases, so the comparison is like for like. A higher Area Score reflects AreaProfile’s standardized weighting rather than a judgment about which is the better place to live.

Data & methodology

Used forSourceSource periodUpdated
AccessFederal Aviation Administration
Airports (NASR) — Aeronautical Data Delivery Service
NASR current cycle28-day NASR cycle
Physical riskFederal Emergency Management Agency
National Risk Index
National Risk Index December 2025 (v1.20.0)Periodic dataset versions (v1.20.0 current)
ClimateNOAA National Centers for Environmental Information
U.S. Climate Normals 1991–2020 (Monthly)
1991-2020 NormalsEvery ten years (next release follows the 2001–2030 period)
JobsU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Local Area Unemployment Statistics
June 2026Monthly
JobsU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics
2025 OEWSAnnual (spring release)
Demographics, Housing, Income, JobsU.S. Census Bureau
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (Table-Based Summary File)
2024 ACS 5-YearAnnual (5-year estimates released each December)

Profile recalculated August 30, 2026. Recalculation is not the same as new source data — each figure above shows the period its source actually covers. Read the full methodology or browse every source.