Portales vs Roseburg

Which is the better fit for you?

Portales, NM
39
Area Score
Bottom 3% nationally
Roseburg, OR
44
Area Score
Bottom 7% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Roseburg receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Portales to Roseburg

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Portales or Roseburg, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$296 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,271 in Roseburg against $975 in Portales.
The median home
117% more
$289,800 in Roseburg against $133,400 in Portales.
The weather you would swap
Winters 11°F milder
Normal January lows are 37°F in Roseburg against 26°F in Portales; July highs are 86°F against 93°F (summers 7°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Portales
Roseburg
Opportunity: Roseburg is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
23 · Bottom 3%
vs
32 · Bottom 8%
Growth: Portales is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
40 · Bottom 29%
vs
37 · Bottom 25%
Climate: Roseburg is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
68 · Bottom 42%
vs
78 · Top 22%
Physical resilience: Roseburg is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
1 · Bottom 1%
vs
18 · Bottom 11%
Housing affordability: Portales is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
77 · Top 21%
vs
59 · Bottom 34%
Schools: Portales is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
54 · Top 44%
vs
52 · Top 46%
Access: Roseburg is the more favorable of the two.
Access
43 · Bottom 2%
vs
61 · Bottom 6%
Economic stability: Roseburg is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
25 · Bottom 5%
vs
31 · Bottom 11%

Measured values

MetricPortalesRoseburgSource period
Population11,96823,7782024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$50,555 ±$4,369$53,918 ±$6,6452024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$21,996$30,430 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,491/sq mi2,208/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$133,400$289,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$903 — more favorable$1,0632024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$975 — more favorable$1,271FY2026
Homeownership rate47.6%53.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.4% — more favorable6.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.2%−0.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate25.4% ±5%21.5% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate27.6% ±6%22.9% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)311722024 calendar year
Permits per 1,000 residents2.6 — more favorable1.52024 calendar year
Permit change (year over year)+34.8%−8.5%2024 calendar year
Average July high93°F86°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low26°F37°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation16.1"32.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport91 mi63 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute13.5 min — more favorable17.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age27.139.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools6122024-25 school year
Students per teacher11.7 — more favorable17.12024-25 school year
Math proficiency19.3%38.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency36.1%57.2%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility99.8%82.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

New Mexico and Oregon do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Portales

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, drought, hail.

Roseburg

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Portales
—
Portales: Your Score
39
Area Score
Roseburg
—
Roseburg: Your Score
44
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Portales, NM · Roseburg, OR · How this is calculated: methodology