Lufkin vs Mount Pleasant

Which is the better fit for you?

Lufkin, TX
55
Area Score
Bottom 36% nationally
Mount Pleasant, TX
58
Area Score
Bottom 46% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Mount Pleasant receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lufkin to Mount Pleasant

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Lufkin or Mount Pleasant, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$48 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $973 in Mount Pleasant against $1,021 in Lufkin.
The median home
5% less
$170,700 in Mount Pleasant against $179,600 in Lufkin.
The weather you would swap
Winters 6°F colder
Normal January lows are 32°F in Mount Pleasant against 38°F in Lufkin; July highs are 93°F against 93°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Lufkin
Mount Pleasant
Opportunity: Mount Pleasant is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
22 · Bottom 2%
vs
35 · Bottom 11%
Growth: Lufkin is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
56 · Top 37%
vs
53 · Top 44%
Climate: Lufkin is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
75 · Top 29%
vs
69 · Bottom 45%
Physical resilience: Lufkin is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
69 · Top 36%
vs
66 · Top 42%
Housing affordability: Mount Pleasant is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
71 · Top 38%
vs
74 · Top 28%
Schools: Mount Pleasant is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
61 · Top 35%
vs
63 · Top 32%
Access: Mount Pleasant is the more favorable of the two.
Access
58 · Bottom 6%
vs
69 · Bottom 11%
Economic stability: Mount Pleasant is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
34 · Bottom 14%
vs
43 · Bottom 25%

Measured values

MetricLufkinMount PleasantSource period
Population34,25116,1362024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$57,048 ±$5,717$50,515 ±$6,0602024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$28,636 — more favorable$23,8142024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,001/sq mi794/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$179,600$170,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,079$910 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,021$973 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate51.6%58.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.6%4.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.0%+1.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher21.8% — more favorable12.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate18.0% ±3%18.5% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)11113712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.28.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+65.7%−37.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high93°F93°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low38°F32°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation50.3"48.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport73 mi56 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate18.7 min ±1.4 min17.3 min ±1.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.630.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools27152024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.912.5 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency55.0%55.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency45.3% — more favorable44.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility74.3%72.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lufkin

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, tornado.

Mount Pleasant

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, hail, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lufkin
—
Lufkin: Your Score
55
Area Score
Mount Pleasant
—
Mount Pleasant: Your Score
58
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lufkin, TX · Mount Pleasant, TX · How this is calculated: methodology