Hobbs vs Lovington

Which is the better fit for you?

Hobbs, NM
48
Area Score
Bottom 13% nationally
Lovington, NM
43
Area Score
Bottom 7% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Hobbs receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Hobbs to Lovington

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Hobbs or Lovington, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,324 in Lovington against $1,324 in Hobbs.
The median home
13% less
$166,100 in Lovington against $191,300 in Hobbs.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 30°F in Lovington against 30°F in Hobbs; July highs are 92°F against 94°F (summers 2°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Hobbs
Lovington
Opportunity: Hobbs is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
41 · Bottom 19%
vs
37 · Bottom 14%
Growth: Hobbs is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
58 · Top 34%
vs
50 · Bottom 48%
Climate: Lovington is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
66 · Bottom 37%
vs
76 · Top 26%
Physical resilience
9 · Bottom 4%
vs
9 · Bottom 4%
Housing affordability: Hobbs is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
75 · Top 25%
vs
68 · Top 47%
Schools: Hobbs is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
40 · Bottom 37%
vs
25 · Bottom 19%
Access: Hobbs is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
91 · Bottom 45%
Economic stability: Hobbs is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
29 · Bottom 9%
vs
21 · Bottom 3%

Measured values

MetricHobbsLovingtonSource period
Population40,25211,4982024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$64,021 ±$6,762$68,821 ±$14,0462024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$32,862 — more favorable$23,7272024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,524/sq mi1,027/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$191,300$166,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,112 ±$54$1,014 ±$1052024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,324$1,324FY2026
Homeownership rate66.0%72.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.8% — more favorable4.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.2%−2.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher17.3% — more favorable8.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate19.1% ±4%25.3% ±7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)13313312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.3 — more favorable1.812 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+14.7%+14.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F92°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low30°F30°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation13.8"14.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport4 mi — more favorable19 miNASR current cycle
Average commute23.7 min — more favorable30.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age32.532.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools19102024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.916.1 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency19.8% — more favorable18.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency32.0% — more favorable30.6%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility64.5%99.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Hobbs

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, hail, inland flooding.

Lovington

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, hail, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Hobbs
—
Hobbs: Your Score
48
Area Score
Lovington
—
Lovington: Your Score
43
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Hobbs, NM · Lovington, NM · How this is calculated: methodology