Gresham vs Vancouver

Which is the better fit for you?

Gresham, OR
47
Area Score
Bottom 13% nationally
Vancouver, WA
55
Area Score
Bottom 38% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Vancouver receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Gresham to Vancouver

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 106.7 against 106.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,922 in Vancouver against $1,922 in Gresham.
The median home
1% more
$462,400 in Vancouver against $458,700 in Gresham.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F colder
Normal January lows are 34°F in Vancouver against 37°F in Gresham; July highs are 81°F against 82°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Gresham
Vancouver
Opportunity: Vancouver is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
40 · Bottom 17%
vs
54 · Bottom 46%
Growth: Vancouver is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
27 · Bottom 12%
vs
57 · Top 35%
Climate: Gresham is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
78 · Top 22%
vs
73 · Top 36%
Physical resilience: Vancouver is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
61 · Top 47%
vs
65 · Top 43%
Housing affordability: Vancouver is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
47 · Bottom 18%
vs
53 · Bottom 25%
Schools: Gresham is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
15 · Bottom 7%
vs
12 · Bottom 5%
Access
90 · Bottom 42%
vs
90 · Bottom 42%
Economic stability: Vancouver is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
52 · Bottom 39%
vs
58 · Top 50%

Measured values

MetricGreshamVancouverSource period
Population112,378195,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$77,795 ±$3,707$81,338 ±$1,5312024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$36,786$45,636 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,769/sq mi4,002/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$458,700$462,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,586 — more favorable$1,7022024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,922$1,922FY2026
Cost of living index106.7106.72023
Homeownership rate55.8%50.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.9%3.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.7% — more favorable−1.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher23.3%32.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate12.2%10.0% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2121,29812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.96.6 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−38.4%+17.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F81°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low37°F34°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation40.7"37.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport10 mi3 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute27.8 min24.6 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.037.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools22632024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.517.8 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency29.9%36.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency50.4%51.1%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility84.8%53.8%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Oregon and Washington do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Gresham

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Vancouver

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Gresham
—
Gresham: Your Score
47
Area Score
Vancouver
—
Vancouver: Your Score
55
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Gresham, OR · Vancouver, WA · How this is calculated: methodology