Foothill Farms vs Sacramento

Which is the better fit for you?

Foothill Farms, CA
50
Area Score
Bottom 19% nationally
Sacramento, CA
55
Area Score
Bottom 37% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Sacramento receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Foothill Farms to Sacramento

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 109.1 against 109.1 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$115 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,215 in Sacramento against $2,100 in Foothill Farms.
The median home
22% more
$506,300 in Sacramento against $414,000 in Foothill Farms.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 41°F in Sacramento against 41°F in Foothill Farms; July highs are 94°F against 94°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Foothill Farms
Sacramento
Opportunity: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
35 · Bottom 11%
vs
43 · Bottom 22%
Growth: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
58 · Top 34%
vs
61 · Top 27%
Climate
81 · Top 16%
vs
81 · Top 16%
Physical resilience
63 · Top 45%
vs
63 · Top 45%
Housing affordability: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
38 · Bottom 8%
vs
52 · Bottom 23%
Schools: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
13 · Bottom 6%
vs
21 · Bottom 14%
Access
100 · Top 4%
vs
100 · Top 4%
Economic stability: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
41 · Bottom 23%
vs
50 · Bottom 35%

Measured values

MetricFoothill FarmsSacramentoSource period
Population36,435528,7062024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$68,260$87,321 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$28,321$43,376 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density8,675/sq mi5,360/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$414,000$506,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,695 — more favorable$1,7792024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,100 — more favorable$2,215FY2026
Cost of living index109.1109.12023
Homeownership rate52.4%51.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.1% — more favorable5.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.1%−2.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher18.2%37.1% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate17.7%13.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)6,3842,39712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.04.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+0.8%+24.8% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F94°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low41°F41°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation19.2"19.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport3 mi — more favorable8 miNASR current cycle
Average commute29.8 min26.5 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age33.636.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools61402024-25 school year
Students per teacher23.122.0 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency27.9%31.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency40.5%44.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility90.6%72.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Foothill Farms

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake.

Sacramento

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Foothill Farms
—
Foothill Farms: Your Score
50
Area Score
Sacramento
—
Sacramento: Your Score
55
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Foothill Farms, CA · Sacramento, CA · How this is calculated: methodology