Cadillac vs Lufkin

Which is the better fit for you?

Cadillac, MI
53
Area Score
Bottom 31% nationally
Lufkin, TX
55
Area Score
Bottom 36% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Lufkin receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Cadillac to Lufkin

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Cadillac or Lufkin, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$63 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,021 in Lufkin against $1,084 in Cadillac.
The median home
34% more
$179,600 in Lufkin against $134,300 in Cadillac.
The weather you would swap
Winters 26°F milder
Normal January lows are 38°F in Lufkin against 12°F in Cadillac; July highs are 93°F against 80°F (summers 13°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Cadillac
Lufkin
Opportunity: Lufkin is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
18 · Bottom 1%
vs
22 · Bottom 2%
Growth: Lufkin is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
52 · Top 45%
vs
56 · Top 37%
Climate: Lufkin is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
54 · Bottom 3%
vs
75 · Top 29%
Physical resilience: Cadillac is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
86 · Top 15%
vs
69 · Top 36%
Housing affordability: Lufkin is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
69 · Top 44%
vs
71 · Top 38%
Schools: Cadillac is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
62 · Top 34%
vs
61 · Top 35%
Access: Lufkin is the more favorable of the two.
Access
48 · Bottom 3%
vs
58 · Bottom 6%
Economic stability
34 · Bottom 14%
vs
34 · Bottom 14%

Measured values

MetricCadillacLufkinSource period
Population10,44534,2512024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$51,773 ±$3,850$57,048 ±$5,7172024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$28,013 ±$2,207$28,636 ±$2,0672024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,256/sq mi1,001/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$134,300$179,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$842 — more favorable$1,0792024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,084$1,021 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate68.8%51.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.3% — more favorable5.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−8.0%−3.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate22.1% ±4%21.8% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate18.2% ±5%18.0% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2711112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.63.2 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+22.7%+65.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high80°F93°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low12°F38°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation35.2"50.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport83 mi73 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute15.4 min — more favorable18.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.734.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools7272024-25 school year
Students per teacher18.113.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency46.5%55.0%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency58.4%45.3%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility51.9%74.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Michigan and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Cadillac

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Lufkin

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Cadillac
—
Cadillac: Your Score
53
Area Score
Lufkin
—
Lufkin: Your Score
55
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Cadillac, MI · Lufkin, TX · How this is calculated: methodology