Blackfoot vs Faribault

Which is the better fit for you?

Blackfoot, ID
52
Area Score
Bottom 26% nationally
Faribault, MN
49
Area Score
Bottom 16% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Blackfoot receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Blackfoot to Faribault

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Blackfoot or Faribault, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$214 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,187 in Faribault against $973 in Blackfoot.
The median home
8% less
$241,500 in Faribault against $262,500 in Blackfoot.
The weather you would swap
Winters 12°F colder
Normal January lows are 5°F in Faribault against 17°F in Blackfoot; July highs are 82°F against 89°F (summers 7°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Blackfoot
Faribault
Opportunity: Blackfoot is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
56 · Bottom 49%
vs
46 · Bottom 29%
Growth: Faribault is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
43 · Bottom 34%
vs
50 · Bottom 49%
Climate: Blackfoot is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
56 · Bottom 7%
vs
52 · Bottom 2%
Physical resilience: Blackfoot is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
52 · Bottom 45%
vs
51 · Bottom 44%
Housing affordability: Blackfoot is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
73 · Top 29%
vs
68 · Top 47%
Schools
17 · Bottom 9%
vs
17 · Bottom 9%
Access: Blackfoot is the more favorable of the two.
Access
86 · Bottom 30%
vs
78 · Bottom 18%
Economic stability: Blackfoot is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
49 · Bottom 34%
vs
40 · Bottom 22%

Measured values

MetricBlackfootFaribaultSource period
Population12,78224,6312024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$64,032 ±$7,059$61,449 ±$3,7282024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$28,259$33,225 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,079/sq mi1,568/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$262,500$241,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$839 — more favorable$1,0742024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$973 — more favorable$1,187FY2026
Homeownership rate69.9%66.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.4% — more favorable4.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.4%−1.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher24.7% — more favorable17.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.7% ±3%15.7% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)322712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.5 — more favorable1.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−65.6%+3.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low17°F5°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation11.8"35.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport23 mi — more favorable40 miNASR current cycle
Average commute23.7 min20.9 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.738.72024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher17.713.5 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency34.2%33.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency46.7%41.0%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Idaho and Minnesota do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Blackfoot

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, heat wave.

Faribault

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind, hail, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Blackfoot
—
Blackfoot: Your Score
52
Area Score
Faribault
—
Faribault: Your Score
49
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Blackfoot, ID · Faribault, MN · How this is calculated: methodology