Tuscaloosa vs Texarkana

Which is the better fit for you?

Tuscaloosa, AL
55
Area Score
Bottom 36% nationally
Texarkana, TX
55
Area Score
Bottom 35% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Tuscaloosa and Texarkana receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Tuscaloosa to Texarkana

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
4% lower
Regional price level 85.6 against 89.1 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$69 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,101 in Texarkana against $1,170 in Tuscaloosa.
The median home
33% less
$171,500 in Texarkana against $255,500 in Tuscaloosa.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 35°F in Texarkana against 35°F in Tuscaloosa; July highs are 93°F against 92°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

30 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Tuscaloosa
Texarkana
Opportunity: Tuscaloosa is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
42 · Bottom 21%
vs
38 · Bottom 14%
Growth: Texarkana is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
60 · Top 29%
vs
73 · Top 11%
Climate
72 · Top 39%
vs
72 · Top 42%
Physical resilience: Tuscaloosa is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
59 · Top 49%
vs
55 · Bottom 48%
Housing affordability: Texarkana is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
66 · Bottom 49%
vs
68 · Top 45%
Schools: Texarkana is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
36 · Bottom 32%
vs
41 · Bottom 40%
Access: Tuscaloosa is the more favorable of the two.
Access
71 · Bottom 12%
vs
56 · Bottom 5%
Economic stability: Tuscaloosa is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
39 · Bottom 20%
vs
26 · Bottom 6%

Measured values

MetricTuscaloosaTexarkanaSource period
Population111,03835,9922024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$51,464 ±$2,918$50,573 ±$5,9072024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$31,728 ±$1,361$30,284 ±$2,3112024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,776/sq mi1,125/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$255,500$171,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,055 ±$26$1,010 ±$402024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,170$1,101 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index89.185.6 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate42.9%51.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.1% — more favorable5.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.8% — more favorable−1.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher39.4% — more favorable27.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate17.0% — more favorable22.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)42927312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.97.6 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−2.3%+111.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high92°F93°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low35°F35°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation57.3"48.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport50 mi — more favorable71 miNASR current cycle
Average commute21.0 min16.4 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age27.237.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools28232024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.312.4 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency45.4%41.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency41.9%44.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility56.7%70.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Alabama and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Tuscaloosa

Elevated or high exposure: tornado, earthquake.

Texarkana

Elevated or high exposure: hail, ice storm.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Tuscaloosa
—
Tuscaloosa: Your Score
55
Area Score
Texarkana
—
Texarkana: Your Score
55
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Tuscaloosa, AL · Texarkana, TX · How this is calculated: methodology