Tupelo vs Mineral Wells

Which is the better fit for you?

Tupelo, MS
61
Area Score
Top 41% nationally
Mineral Wells, TX
58
Area Score
Bottom 47% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Tupelo receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Tupelo to Mineral Wells

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Tupelo or Mineral Wells, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$86 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,080 in Mineral Wells against $994 in Tupelo.
The median home
24% less
$161,300 in Mineral Wells against $212,800 in Tupelo.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 33°F in Mineral Wells against 34°F in Tupelo; July highs are 96°F against 92°F (summers 4°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Tupelo
Mineral Wells
Opportunity: Tupelo is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
59 · Top 45%
vs
55 · Bottom 47%
Growth: Mineral Wells is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
46 · Bottom 42%
vs
51 · Top 49%
Climate: Tupelo is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
71 · Top 45%
vs
70 · Bottom 48%
Physical resilience: Tupelo is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
69 · Top 38%
vs
64 · Top 44%
Housing affordability: Mineral Wells is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
66 · Bottom 49%
vs
71 · Top 36%
Schools: Tupelo is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
61 · Top 35%
vs
41 · Bottom 38%
Access: Mineral Wells is the more favorable of the two.
Access
68 · Bottom 10%
vs
76 · Bottom 16%
Economic stability: Tupelo is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
38 · Bottom 19%
vs
26 · Bottom 6%

Measured values

MetricTupeloMineral WellsSource period
Population37,79115,2442024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$66,257 — more favorable$55,9292024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$38,068 — more favorable$26,1242024 ACS 5-Year
Population density587/sq mi747/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$212,800$161,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$976 ±$74$1,077 ±$1002024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$994 — more favorable$1,080FY2026
Homeownership rate63.4%59.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.6% — more favorable4.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.5%+1.3% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher34.5% — more favorable11.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate14.4% — more favorable22.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)992012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.6 — more favorable1.312 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−3.9%−4.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high92°F96°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low34°F33°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation57.7"31.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport57 mi46 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute19.8 min — more favorable26.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.338.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1622024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.6 — more favorable15.42024-25 school year
Math proficiency50.0%45.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency47.9%44.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility67.5%73.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Mississippi and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Tupelo

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, tornado.

Mineral Wells

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Tupelo
—
Tupelo: Your Score
61
Area Score
Mineral Wells
—
Mineral Wells: Your Score
58
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Tupelo, MS · Mineral Wells, TX · How this is calculated: methodology