Tucson Mountains vs Lake Arrowhead

Which is the better fit for you?

Tucson Mountains, AZ
42
Area Score
Bottom 5% nationally
Lake Arrowhead, CA
37
Area Score
Bottom 1% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Tucson Mountains receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Tucson Mountains to Lake Arrowhead

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
13% higher
Regional price level 107.3 against 94.9 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$791 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,201 in Lake Arrowhead against $1,410 in Tucson Mountains.
The median home
26% more
$596,500 in Lake Arrowhead against $473,200 in Tucson Mountains.
The weather you would swap
Winters 12°F colder
Normal January lows are 29°F in Lake Arrowhead against 41°F in Tucson Mountains; July highs are 81°F against 99°F (summers 18°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

30 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Tucson Mountains
Lake Arrowhead
Opportunity: Lake Arrowhead is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
37 · Bottom 14%
vs
45 · Bottom 27%
Growth: Tucson Mountains is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
51 · Top 49%
vs
43 · Bottom 33%
Climate: Lake Arrowhead is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
64 · Bottom 33%
vs
66 · Bottom 36%
Physical resilience: Tucson Mountains is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
19 · Bottom 13%
vs
7 · Bottom 2%
Housing affordability: Tucson Mountains is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
40 · Bottom 10%
vs
33 · Bottom 5%
Schools: Tucson Mountains is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
23 · Bottom 16%
vs
6 · Bottom 1%
Access: Lake Arrowhead is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 35%
vs
99 · Top 10%
Economic stability: Tucson Mountains is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
58 · Top 50%
vs
45 · Bottom 27%

Measured values

MetricTucson MountainsLake ArrowheadSource period
Population11,35310,6392024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$134,474 — more favorable$95,2362024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$63,076 — more favorable$51,5942024 ACS 5-Year
Population density431/sq mi602/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$473,200$596,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,450 ±$1,027$1,875 ±$3712024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,410 — more favorable$2,201FY2026
Cost of living index94.9 — more favorable107.32023
Homeownership rate96.2%83.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.6%5.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−4.5%−1.8% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher59.0% — more favorable37.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate9.3% ±6%11.0% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4,7905,79612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.5 — more favorable2.612 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+5.2% — more favorable−19.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high99°F81°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low41°F29°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation11.1"37.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport14 mi11 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute28.3 min — more favorable38.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age55.949.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1352024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.8 — more favorable22.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency31.9%17.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency34.4%40.2%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Arizona and California do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Tucson Mountains

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, inland flooding.

Lake Arrowhead

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Tucson Mountains
—
Tucson Mountains: Your Score
42
Area Score
Lake Arrowhead
—
Lake Arrowhead: Your Score
37
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Tucson Mountains, AZ · Lake Arrowhead, CA · How this is calculated: methodology