Tucker vs Peekskill

Which is the better fit for you?

Tucker, GA
60
Area Score
Top 47% nationally
Peekskill, NY
60
Area Score
Top 44% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Tucker and Peekskill receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Tucker to Peekskill

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
12% higher
Regional price level 112.6 against 100.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$1,019 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,910 in Peekskill against $1,891 in Tucker.
The median home
3% more
$395,600 in Peekskill against $384,500 in Tucker.
The weather you would swap
Winters 11°F colder
Normal January lows are 22°F in Peekskill against 33°F in Tucker; July highs are 83°F against 89°F (summers 6°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

32 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Tucker
Peekskill
Opportunity: Tucker is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
79 · Top 9%
vs
77 · Top 13%
Growth: Peekskill is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
23 · Bottom 7%
vs
24 · Bottom 8%
Climate: Tucker is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
78 · Top 21%
vs
65 · Bottom 34%
Physical resilience: Peekskill is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
69 · Top 38%
vs
85 · Top 16%
Housing affordability: Peekskill is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
50 · Bottom 21%
vs
53 · Bottom 25%
Schools: Tucker is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
34 · Bottom 30%
vs
28 · Bottom 22%
Access: Peekskill is the more favorable of the two.
Access
85 · Bottom 27%
vs
95 · Top 42%
Economic stability: Peekskill is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
52 · Bottom 40%
vs
54 · Bottom 43%

Measured values

MetricTuckerPeekskillSource period
Population37,12325,6252024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$80,317 ±$7,708$85,954 ±$5,1292024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$48,128 ±$4,134$45,565 ±$3,3772024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,836/sq mi5,899/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$384,500$395,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,647 — more favorable$2,0362024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,891 — more favorable$2,910FY2026
Cost of living index100.5 — more favorable112.62023
Homeownership rate63.0%59.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.0% — more favorable3.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.0%+1.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher44.7% — more favorable37.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.7% ±3%11.9% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)7112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.2 — more favorable0.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−41.7%−83.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low33°F22°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation51.4"47.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport19 mi18 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute30.9 min — more favorable40.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age42.841.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools2662024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.612.8 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency31.8%50.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency33.6%50.7%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility94.2%50.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Georgia and New York do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Tucker

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Peekskill

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Tucker
—
Tucker: Your Score
60
Area Score
Peekskill
—
Peekskill: Your Score
60
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Tucker, GA · Peekskill, NY · How this is calculated: methodology