Tacoma vs White Center

Which is the better fit for you?

Tacoma, WA
51
Area Score
Bottom 23% nationally
White Center, WA
55
Area Score
Bottom 38% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

White Center receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Tacoma to White Center

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.7 against 112.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$232 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,188 in White Center against $2,420 in Tacoma.
The median home
35% more
$645,200 in White Center against $479,600 in Tacoma.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F milder
Normal January lows are 37°F in White Center against 36°F in Tacoma; July highs are 77°F against 76°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Tacoma
White Center
Opportunity: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
47 · Bottom 32%
vs
46 · Bottom 28%
Growth: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
72 · Top 12%
vs
58 · Top 33%
Climate
74 · Top 35%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience: White Center is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
32 · Bottom 26%
vs
41 · Bottom 31%
Housing affordability: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
53 · Bottom 25%
vs
50 · Bottom 20%
Schools: White Center is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
18 · Bottom 9%
vs
60 · Top 36%
Access: White Center is the more favorable of the two.
Access
91 · Bottom 46%
vs
95 · Top 42%
Economic stability: White Center is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
53 · Bottom 41%
vs
56 · Bottom 47%

Measured values

MetricTacomaWhite CenterSource period
Population222,75814,8862024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$85,884 ±$1,903$87,189 ±$11,7862024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$45,650 ±$826$46,346 ±$3,4202024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,480/sq mi6,543/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$479,600$645,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,676 ±$28$1,595 ±$1272024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,420$2,188 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index112.7112.72023
Homeownership rate55.8%55.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.4%4.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.1% — more favorable−1.3%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate34.5% ±1%35.9% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate12.0% ±1%13.9% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,26711,59312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents5.7 — more favorable5.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+155.4% — more favorable+44.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high76°F77°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low36°F37°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation42.0"36.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport15 mi3 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate30.6 min ±0.7 min32.9 min ±2.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.237.62024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher18.918.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency38.8%58.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency55.3%70.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

6 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Tacoma

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

White Center

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Tacoma
—
Tacoma: Your Score
51
Area Score
White Center
—
White Center: Your Score
55
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Tacoma, WA · White Center, WA · How this is calculated: methodology