Tacoma vs Tukwila

Which is the better fit for you?

Tacoma, WA
51
Area Score
Bottom 23% nationally
Tukwila, WA
42
Area Score
Bottom 5% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Tacoma receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Tacoma to Tukwila

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.7 against 112.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$187 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,233 in Tukwila against $2,420 in Tacoma.
The median home
2% more
$489,000 in Tukwila against $479,600 in Tacoma.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 38°F in Tukwila against 36°F in Tacoma; July highs are 77°F against 76°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Tacoma
Tukwila
Opportunity: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
47 · Bottom 32%
vs
42 · Bottom 20%
Growth: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
72 · Top 12%
vs
22 · Bottom 6%
Climate
74 · Top 35%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience: Tukwila is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
32 · Bottom 26%
vs
41 · Bottom 31%
Housing affordability: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
53 · Bottom 25%
vs
47 · Bottom 17%
Schools: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
18 · Bottom 9%
vs
5 · Bottom 1%
Access: Tukwila is the more favorable of the two.
Access
91 · Bottom 46%
vs
95 · Top 42%
Economic stability: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
53 · Bottom 41%
vs
50 · Bottom 36%

Measured values

MetricTacomaTukwilaSource period
Population222,75821,4512024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$85,884 ±$1,903$78,381 ±$7,3502024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$45,650 — more favorable$39,1582024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,480/sq mi2,335/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$479,600$489,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,676 — more favorable$1,8982024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,420$2,233 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index112.7112.72023
Homeownership rate55.8%40.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.4%4.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.1% — more favorable−1.3%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher34.5% — more favorable25.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate12.0% ±1%12.6% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,2672412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents5.7 — more favorable1.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+155.4%−91.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high76°F77°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low36°F38°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation42.0"39.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport15 mi2 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute30.6 min27.2 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.235.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools62192024-25 school year
Students per teacher18.918.8 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency38.8% — more favorable30.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency55.3% — more favorable42.5%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility56.9%75.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Tacoma

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Tukwila

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Tacoma
—
Tacoma: Your Score
51
Area Score
Tukwila
—
Tukwila: Your Score
42
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Tacoma, WA · Tukwila, WA · How this is calculated: methodology