St. Louis Park vs St. Paul

Which is the better fit for you?

St. Louis Park, MN
67
Area Score
Top 23% nationally
St. Paul, MN
56
Area Score
Bottom 38% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

St. Louis Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from St. Louis Park to St. Paul

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 104.3 against 104.3 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,709 in St. Paul against $1,709 in St. Louis Park.
The median home
24% less
$294,500 in St. Paul against $386,800 in St. Louis Park.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 9°F in St. Paul against 7°F in St. Louis Park; July highs are 83°F against 83°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

St. Louis Park
St. Paul
Opportunity: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
56 · Bottom 49%
vs
43 · Bottom 23%
Growth: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
66 · Top 20%
vs
34 · Bottom 21%
Climate: St. Paul is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
54 · Bottom 3%
vs
55 · Bottom 5%
Physical resilience
93 · Top 7%
vs
93 · Top 7%
Housing affordability: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
81 · Top 10%
vs
73 · Top 32%
Schools: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
37 · Bottom 33%
vs
18 · Bottom 10%
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
74 · Top 15%
vs
51 · Bottom 37%

Measured values

MetricSt. Louis ParkSt. PaulSource period
Population49,594307,2842024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$101,648 — more favorable$73,3942024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$64,370 — more favorable$42,8152024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,668/sq mi5,912/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$386,800$294,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,644$1,281 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,709$1,709FY2026
Cost of living index104.3104.32023
Homeownership rate57.8%52.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9% — more favorable4.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.1%−2.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher64.2% — more favorable43.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate6.7% — more favorable14.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)61343712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents12.4 — more favorable1.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+20333.3% — more favorable+46.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low7°F9°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation30.7"29.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport8 mi7 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate21.9 min ±0.8 min22.8 min ±0.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.133.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools161412024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.315.1 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency49.0% — more favorable37.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency59.4% — more favorable44.9%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility36.4%66.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

St. Louis Park

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

St. Paul

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

St. Louis Park
—
St. Louis Park: Your Score
67
Area Score
St. Paul
—
St. Paul: Your Score
56
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: St. Louis Park, MN · St. Paul, MN · How this is calculated: methodology