Spencer vs Kearney

Which is the better fit for you?

Spencer, IA
58
Area Score
Bottom 47% nationally
Kearney, NE
62
Area Score
Top 38% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Kearney receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Spencer to Kearney

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Spencer or Kearney, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$112 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,031 in Kearney against $919 in Spencer.
The median home
32% more
$244,600 in Kearney against $184,800 in Spencer.
The weather you would swap
Winters 6°F milder
Normal January lows are 14°F in Kearney against 8°F in Spencer; July highs are 87°F against 85°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Spencer
Kearney
Opportunity: Kearney is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
61 · Top 39%
vs
76 · Top 15%
Growth: Spencer is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
69 · Top 17%
vs
63 · Top 24%
Climate: Kearney is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
55 · Bottom 4%
vs
59 · Bottom 11%
Physical resilience: Spencer is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
27 · Bottom 22%
vs
25 · Bottom 20%
Housing affordability
79 · Top 14%
vs
79 · Top 15%
Schools: Kearney is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
67 · Top 28%
vs
80 · Top 12%
Access: Spencer is the more favorable of the two.
Access
49 · Bottom 3%
vs
40 · Bottom 2%
Economic stability: Kearney is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
57 · Bottom 48%
vs
65 · Top 35%

Measured values

MetricSpencerKearneySource period
Population11,40034,2462024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$59,667$69,724 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$37,510 ±$2,884$37,716 ±$1,9782024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,041/sq mi2,277/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$184,800$244,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$805 — more favorable$9492024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$919 — more favorable$1,031FY2026
Homeownership rate68.1%60.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.9%2.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.7%−0.3% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher29.8%36.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.6% ±3%9.9% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5110712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.5 — more favorable3.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+292.3%+4.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F87°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low8°F14°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation26.8"25.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport81 mi — more favorable89 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate16.3 min ±2.0 min15.5 min ±0.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.432.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools5162024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.5 — more favorable16.02024-25 school year
Math proficiency77.5%57.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency79.1%56.0%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility50.3%32.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Iowa and Nebraska do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Spencer

Elevated or high exposure: hail, tornado, inland flooding.

Kearney

Elevated or high exposure: hail, strong wind, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Spencer
—
Spencer: Your Score
58
Area Score
Kearney
—
Kearney: Your Score
62
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Spencer, IA · Kearney, NE · How this is calculated: methodology