Snohomish vs Tacoma

Which is the better fit for you?

Snohomish, WA
51
Area Score
Bottom 22% nationally
Tacoma, WA
51
Area Score
Bottom 23% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Snohomish and Tacoma receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Snohomish to Tacoma

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.7 against 112.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$81 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,420 in Tacoma against $2,501 in Snohomish.
The median home
30% less
$479,600 in Tacoma against $683,900 in Snohomish.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 36°F in Tacoma against 37°F in Snohomish; July highs are 76°F against 72°F (summers 4°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Snohomish
Tacoma
Opportunity: Snohomish is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
52 · Bottom 41%
vs
47 · Bottom 32%
Growth: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
31 · Bottom 16%
vs
72 · Top 12%
Climate
74 · Top 35%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience: Snohomish is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
45 · Bottom 35%
vs
32 · Bottom 26%
Housing affordability: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
42 · Bottom 12%
vs
53 · Bottom 25%
Schools: Snohomish is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
48 · Bottom 47%
vs
18 · Bottom 9%
Access: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Access
82 · Bottom 24%
vs
91 · Bottom 46%
Economic stability: Snohomish is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
58 · Bottom 49%
vs
53 · Bottom 41%

Measured values

MetricSnohomishTacomaSource period
Population10,239222,7582024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$87,250 ±$12,145$85,884 ±$1,9032024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$51,704 — more favorable$45,6502024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,908/sq mi4,480/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$683,900$479,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,654 ±$314$1,676 ±$282024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,501$2,420 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index112.7112.72023
Homeownership rate55.4%55.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.0% — more favorable5.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.7% — more favorable−1.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate34.4% ±4%34.5% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate6.9% — more favorable12.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)81,26712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.85.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−84.9%+155.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high72°F76°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low37°F36°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.4"42.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport29 mi15 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate31.9 min ±2.4 min30.6 min ±0.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age42.537.22024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher18.8 — more favorable18.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency52.5% — more favorable38.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency67.4% — more favorable55.3%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Snohomish

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Tacoma

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Snohomish
—
Snohomish: Your Score
51
Area Score
Tacoma
—
Tacoma: Your Score
51
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Snohomish, WA · Tacoma, WA · How this is calculated: methodology