Sacramento vs Aurora

Which is the better fit for you?

Sacramento, CA
55
Area Score
Bottom 37% nationally
Aurora, CO
52
Area Score
Bottom 27% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Sacramento receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Sacramento to Aurora

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
3% lower
Regional price level 105.8 against 109.1 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$126 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,089 in Aurora against $2,215 in Sacramento.
The median home
7% less
$469,100 in Aurora against $506,300 in Sacramento.
The weather you would swap
Winters 23°F colder
Normal January lows are 18°F in Aurora against 41°F in Sacramento; July highs are 90°F against 94°F (summers 4°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

34 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Sacramento
Aurora
Opportunity: Aurora is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
43 · Bottom 22%
vs
50 · Bottom 37%
Growth: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
61 · Top 27%
vs
60 · Top 28%
Climate: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
81 · Top 16%
vs
59 · Bottom 11%
Physical resilience: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
63 · Top 45%
vs
55 · Bottom 47%
Housing affordability: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
52 · Bottom 23%
vs
49 · Bottom 20%
Schools: Aurora is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
21 · Bottom 14%
vs
22 · Bottom 15%
Access: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Access
100 · Top 4%
vs
99 · Top 9%
Economic stability: Aurora is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
50 · Bottom 35%
vs
60 · Top 46%

Measured values

MetricSacramentoAuroraSource period
Population528,706394,4322024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$87,321 ±$1,746$88,368 ±$2,0172024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$43,376 — more favorable$42,1052024 ACS 5-Year
Population density5,360/sq mi2,404/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$506,300$469,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,779 — more favorable$1,8352024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,215$2,089 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index109.1105.8 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate51.7%62.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.3%4.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.1%−1.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher37.1% — more favorable33.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate13.5%11.6% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2,3971,83312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.54.6 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+24.8%+45.2% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F90°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low41°F18°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation19.2"15.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport8 mi — more favorable11 miNASR current cycle
Average commute26.5 min — more favorable30.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.035.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools140892024-25 school year
Students per teacher22.017.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency31.1%26.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency44.1%36.7%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility72.9%65.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

California and Colorado do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Sacramento

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake.

Aurora

Elevated or high exposure: hail, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Sacramento
—
Sacramento: Your Score
55
Area Score
Aurora
—
Aurora: Your Score
52
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Sacramento, CA · Aurora, CO · How this is calculated: methodology