Rio Linda vs Sacramento

Which is the better fit for you?

Rio Linda, CA
54
Area Score
Bottom 33% nationally
Sacramento, CA
55
Area Score
Bottom 37% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Sacramento receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Rio Linda to Sacramento

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 109.1 against 109.1 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$66 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,215 in Sacramento against $2,281 in Rio Linda.
The median home
10% more
$506,300 in Sacramento against $458,300 in Rio Linda.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F milder
Normal January lows are 41°F in Sacramento against 38°F in Rio Linda; July highs are 94°F against 94°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Rio Linda
Sacramento
Opportunity: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
39 · Bottom 17%
vs
43 · Bottom 22%
Growth: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
58 · Top 34%
vs
61 · Top 27%
Climate: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
75 · Top 30%
vs
81 · Top 16%
Physical resilience
63 · Top 45%
vs
63 · Top 45%
Housing affordability
52 · Bottom 24%
vs
52 · Bottom 23%
Schools: Rio Linda is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
28 · Bottom 23%
vs
21 · Bottom 14%
Access
100 · Top 4%
vs
100 · Top 4%
Economic stability: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
43 · Bottom 26%
vs
50 · Bottom 35%

Measured values

MetricRio LindaSacramentoSource period
Population16,335528,7062024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$96,364 ±$11,916$87,321 ±$1,7462024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$38,791 ±$4,607$43,376 ±$7892024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,646/sq mi5,360/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$458,300$506,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,839 ±$200$1,779 ±$192024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,281$2,215 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index109.1109.12023
Homeownership rate72.9%51.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.1% — more favorable5.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.1%−2.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher15.9%37.1% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate14.6% ±4%13.5% ±0.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)6,3842,39712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.04.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+0.8%+24.8% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F94°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low38°F41°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation18.0"19.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport3 mi — more favorable8 miNASR current cycle
Average commute30.3 min26.5 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.736.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools71402024-25 school year
Students per teacher22.222.0 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency34.0% — more favorable31.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency47.4% — more favorable44.1%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility75.7%72.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Rio Linda

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake.

Sacramento

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Rio Linda
—
Rio Linda: Your Score
54
Area Score
Sacramento
—
Sacramento: Your Score
55
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Rio Linda, CA · Sacramento, CA · How this is calculated: methodology