Raleigh vs New Braunfels

Which is the better fit for you?

Raleigh, NC
70
Area Score
Top 13% nationally
New Braunfels, TX
69
Area Score
Top 16% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Raleigh receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Raleigh to New Braunfels

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
4% lower
Regional price level 94.3 against 98.4 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$17 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,660 in New Braunfels against $1,677 in Raleigh.
The median home
18% less
$339,400 in New Braunfels against $415,800 in Raleigh.
The weather you would swap
Winters 8°F milder
Normal January lows are 40°F in New Braunfels against 32°F in Raleigh; July highs are 96°F against 91°F (summers 5°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

33 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Raleigh
New Braunfels
Opportunity: Raleigh is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
72 · Top 20%
vs
70 · Top 24%
Growth: New Braunfels is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
68 · Top 17%
vs
70 · Top 15%
Climate: Raleigh is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 43%
vs
71 · Top 45%
Physical resilience: Raleigh is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
73 · Top 33%
vs
70 · Top 36%
Housing affordability: New Braunfels is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
67 · Top 50%
vs
68 · Top 46%
Schools: Raleigh is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
63 · Top 33%
vs
59 · Top 37%
Access: Raleigh is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
89 · Bottom 38%
Economic stability: New Braunfels is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
57 · Bottom 48%
vs
63 · Top 39%

Measured values

MetricRaleighNew BraunfelsSource period
Population481,031104,6432024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$85,395 ±$2,159$86,021 ±$5,4042024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$52,897 — more favorable$44,5962024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,187/sq mi2,324/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$415,800$339,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,572 — more favorable$1,6542024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,677$1,660 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index98.494.3 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate50.7%65.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.3% — more favorable4.1%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.1%−0.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher54.0% — more favorable38.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate10.3%7.4% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5,1241,29512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents10.712.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−0.6% — more favorable−17.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high91°F96°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low32°F40°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation46.1"31.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport9 mi — more favorable24 miNASR current cycle
Average commute24.8 min — more favorable28.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.737.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools100262024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.7 — more favorable15.22024-25 school year
Math proficiency47.1%51.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency52.4%49.6%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility51.5%39.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

North Carolina and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Raleigh
—
Raleigh: Your Score
70
Area Score
New Braunfels
—
New Braunfels: Your Score
69
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Raleigh, NC · New Braunfels, TX · How this is calculated: methodology