Pampa vs Fairmont

Which is the better fit for you?

Pampa, TX
47
Area Score
Bottom 12% nationally
Fairmont, WV
53
Area Score
Bottom 30% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Fairmont receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Pampa to Fairmont

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Pampa or Fairmont, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$30 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,007 in Fairmont against $1,037 in Pampa.
The median home
63% more
$163,800 in Fairmont against $100,700 in Pampa.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 25°F in Fairmont against 23°F in Pampa; July highs are 86°F against 93°F (summers 7°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Pampa
Fairmont
Opportunity: Fairmont is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
50 · Bottom 38%
vs
56 · Bottom 49%
Growth: Fairmont is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
20 · Bottom 6%
vs
30 · Bottom 15%
Climate: Fairmont is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
67 · Bottom 38%
vs
74 · Top 32%
Physical resilience: Fairmont is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
23 · Bottom 17%
vs
29 · Bottom 22%
Housing affordability: Fairmont is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
72 · Top 34%
vs
79 · Top 15%
Schools: Fairmont is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
50 · Top 49%
vs
59 · Top 38%
Access: Pampa is the more favorable of the two.
Access
67 · Bottom 9%
vs
58 · Bottom 6%
Economic stability: Fairmont is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
34 · Bottom 13%
vs
39 · Bottom 20%

Measured values

MetricPampaFairmontSource period
Population16,65918,2212024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$56,626 ±$6,957$63,032 ±$2,6892024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$35,014 ±$4,415$34,306 ±$2,0452024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,847/sq mi2,118/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$100,700$163,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$934 ±$46$916 ±$802024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,037$1,007 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate74.1%63.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.2%4.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.3%+0.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher17.0%32.9% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate16.4% ±3%16.8% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)3412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.20.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−50.0%0.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high93°F86°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low23°F25°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation22.8"44.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport48 mi — more favorable68 miNASR current cycle
Average commute18.4 min — more favorable24.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age35.334.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools6132024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.714.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency56.6%43.8%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Texas and West Virginia do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Pampa

Elevated or high exposure: drought, wildfire, hail.

Fairmont

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Pampa
—
Pampa: Your Score
47
Area Score
Fairmont
—
Fairmont: Your Score
53
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Pampa, TX · Fairmont, WV · How this is calculated: methodology