Omaha vs Fargo

Which is the better fit for you?

Omaha, NE
66
Area Score
Top 26% nationally
Fargo, ND
68
Area Score
Top 19% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Fargo receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Omaha to Fargo

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
4% lower
Regional price level 89.1 against 92.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$286 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,110 in Fargo against $1,396 in Omaha.
The median home
15% more
$281,900 in Fargo against $245,500 in Omaha.
The weather you would swap
Winters 15°F colder
Normal January lows are 0°F in Fargo against 15°F in Omaha; July highs are 82°F against 85°F (summers 3°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

32 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Omaha
Fargo
Opportunity: Omaha is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
78 · Top 10%
vs
77 · Top 12%
Growth: Fargo is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
61 · Top 28%
vs
62 · Top 25%
Climate: Omaha is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
59 · Bottom 12%
vs
49 · Bottom 1%
Physical resilience: Omaha is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
62 · Top 46%
vs
59 · Top 48%
Housing affordability: Fargo is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
73 · Top 32%
vs
81 · Top 11%
Access: Omaha is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
90 · Bottom 42%
Economic stability: Fargo is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
56 · Bottom 47%
vs
65 · Top 35%

Measured values

MetricOmahaFargoSource period
Population488,837131,6272024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$73,201 — more favorable$66,9982024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$43,638 ±$767$42,734 ±$1,3712024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,420/sq mi2,557/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$245,500$281,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,187$946 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,396$1,110 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index92.589.1 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate57.4%43.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.3%2.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.6% — more favorable+0.3%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher40.1%42.9% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate12.5%9.9% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)3,48767712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents7.1 — more favorable5.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−11.5%−7.4% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low15°F0°F1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport9 mi4 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute21.0 min16.9 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age35.331.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools186272024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.411.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency48.4%47.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency50.4%49.0%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility25.9%36.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise. This is common on these pages by construction: Omaha and Fargo were paired because they are alike, and the more alike two places are, the less a sample of this size can tell them apart.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Nebraska and North Dakota do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Omaha

Elevated or high exposure: hail, tornado, heat wave.

Fargo

Elevated or high exposure: winter weather, strong wind, hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Omaha
—
Omaha: Your Score
66
Area Score
Fargo
—
Fargo: Your Score
68
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Omaha, NE · Fargo, ND · How this is calculated: methodology