Newcastle vs Tacoma

Which is the better fit for you?

Newcastle, WA
54
Area Score
Bottom 34% nationally
Tacoma, WA
51
Area Score
Bottom 23% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Newcastle receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Newcastle to Tacoma

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.7 against 112.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$148 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,420 in Tacoma against $2,568 in Newcastle.
The median home
60% less
$479,600 in Tacoma against $1,205,600 in Newcastle.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 36°F in Tacoma against 37°F in Newcastle; July highs are 76°F against 77°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Newcastle
Tacoma
Opportunity: Newcastle is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
53 · Bottom 43%
vs
47 · Bottom 32%
Growth: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
34 · Bottom 20%
vs
72 · Top 12%
Climate
74 · Top 35%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience: Newcastle is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
41 · Bottom 31%
vs
32 · Bottom 26%
Housing affordability: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
48 · Bottom 19%
vs
53 · Bottom 25%
Schools: Newcastle is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
60 · Top 36%
vs
18 · Bottom 9%
Access: Newcastle is the more favorable of the two.
Access
95 · Top 42%
vs
91 · Bottom 46%
Economic stability: Newcastle is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
72 · Top 19%
vs
53 · Bottom 41%

Measured values

MetricNewcastleTacomaSource period
Population12,989222,7582024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$160,278 — more favorable$85,8842024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$91,506 — more favorable$45,6502024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,929/sq mi4,480/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$1,205,600$479,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,369$1,676 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,568$2,420 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index112.7112.72023
Homeownership rate61.0%55.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.9% — more favorable5.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.3%−1.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher68.5% — more favorable34.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate3.9% — more favorable12.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)331,26712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.55.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−59.3%+155.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high77°F76°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low37°F36°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.7"42.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport6 mi — more favorable15 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate30.1 min ±2.5 min30.6 min ±0.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.537.22024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher18.3 — more favorable18.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency58.7% — more favorable38.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency70.3% — more favorable55.3%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Newcastle

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Tacoma

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Newcastle
—
Newcastle: Your Score
54
Area Score
Tacoma
—
Tacoma: Your Score
51
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Newcastle, WA · Tacoma, WA · How this is calculated: methodology