Milledgeville vs Laurel

Which is the better fit for you?

Milledgeville, GA
52
Area Score
Bottom 25% nationally
Laurel, MS
49
Area Score
Bottom 18% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Milledgeville receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Milledgeville to Laurel

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Milledgeville or Laurel, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$156 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $917 in Laurel against $1,073 in Milledgeville.
The median home
35% less
$125,800 in Laurel against $193,100 in Milledgeville.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 35°F in Laurel against 33°F in Milledgeville; July highs are 93°F against 93°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Milledgeville
Laurel
Opportunity: Milledgeville is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
66 · Top 30%
vs
61 · Top 39%
Growth: Milledgeville is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
33 · Bottom 18%
vs
18 · Bottom 4%
Climate: Laurel is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
70 · Bottom 47%
vs
75 · Top 29%
Physical resilience: Milledgeville is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
62 · Top 46%
vs
49 · Bottom 42%
Housing affordability: Laurel is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
63 · Bottom 42%
vs
69 · Top 43%
Schools: Laurel is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
16 · Bottom 8%
vs
20 · Bottom 13%
Access: Laurel is the more favorable of the two.
Access
52 · Bottom 4%
vs
59 · Bottom 6%
Economic stability: Laurel is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
10 · Bottom 1%
vs
22 · Bottom 3%

Measured values

MetricMilledgevilleLaurelSource period
Population16,74817,6792024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$41,616 ±$6,196$47,661 ±$5,5012024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$29,069 ±$15,575$30,835 ±$4,6472024 ACS 5-Year
Population density827/sq mi958/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$193,100$125,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$913 ±$66$909 ±$582024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,073$917 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate33.1%63.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.7%2.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+3.4% — more favorable−1.5%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate21.1% ±4%21.8% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate32.0%22.4% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.3 — more favorable0.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−54.5%−100.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high93°F93°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low33°F35°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation48.2"59.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport76 mi69 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute24.1 min18.2 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age28.535.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools792024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.2 — more favorable16.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency21.9%30.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency27.5%23.9%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility86.3%100.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Georgia and Mississippi do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Milledgeville

Elevated or high exposure: drought, cold wave.

Laurel

Elevated or high exposure: tornado, hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Milledgeville
—
Milledgeville: Your Score
52
Area Score
Laurel
—
Laurel: Your Score
49
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Milledgeville, GA · Laurel, MS · How this is calculated: methodology