Manchester vs Mineral Wells

Which is the better fit for you?

Manchester, TN
59
Area Score
Top 49% nationally
Mineral Wells, TX
58
Area Score
Bottom 47% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Manchester receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Manchester to Mineral Wells

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Manchester or Mineral Wells, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$121 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,080 in Mineral Wells against $959 in Manchester.
The median home
32% less
$161,300 in Mineral Wells against $237,400 in Manchester.
The weather you would swap
Winters 7°F milder
Normal January lows are 33°F in Mineral Wells against 26°F in Manchester; July highs are 96°F against 86°F (summers 10°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Manchester
Mineral Wells
Opportunity: Manchester is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
57 · Top 48%
vs
55 · Bottom 47%
Growth: Manchester is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
52 · Top 45%
vs
51 · Top 49%
Climate: Manchester is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
75 · Top 28%
vs
70 · Bottom 48%
Physical resilience: Mineral Wells is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
57 · Bottom 49%
vs
64 · Top 44%
Housing affordability: Manchester is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
76 · Top 21%
vs
71 · Top 36%
Schools: Mineral Wells is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
35 · Bottom 31%
vs
41 · Bottom 38%
Access: Mineral Wells is the more favorable of the two.
Access
74 · Bottom 15%
vs
76 · Bottom 16%
Economic stability: Manchester is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
49 · Bottom 35%
vs
26 · Bottom 6%

Measured values

MetricManchesterMineral WellsSource period
Population12,94415,2442024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$57,500 ±$5,600$55,929 ±$5,2172024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$30,122 ±$3,918$26,124 ±$1,7092024 ACS 5-Year
Population density844/sq mi747/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$237,400$161,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$978 ±$66$1,077 ±$1002024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$959 — more favorable$1,080FY2026
Homeownership rate51.5%59.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.4% — more favorable4.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.7%+1.3% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher22.9% — more favorable11.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate15.9% — more favorable22.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)642012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.9 — more favorable1.312 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−38.5%−4.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high86°F96°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low26°F33°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation59.3"31.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport45 mi — more favorable46 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate27.3 min ±2.9 min26.8 min ±2.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age32.638.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1122024-25 school year
Math proficiency33.5%45.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency37.5%44.8%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Tennessee and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Manchester

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, tornado.

Mineral Wells

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Manchester
—
Manchester: Your Score
59
Area Score
Mineral Wells
—
Mineral Wells: Your Score
58
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Manchester, TN · Mineral Wells, TX · How this is calculated: methodology