Manchester vs O'Fallon

Which is the better fit for you?

Manchester, MO
67
Area Score
Top 24% nationally
O'Fallon, MO
74
Area Score
Top 5% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

O'Fallon receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Manchester to O'Fallon

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 95.0 against 95.0 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$27 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,570 in O'Fallon against $1,543 in Manchester.
The median home
1% more
$326,200 in O'Fallon against $323,100 in Manchester.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 22°F in O'Fallon against 22°F in Manchester; July highs are 90°F against 90°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Manchester
O'Fallon
Opportunity: O'Fallon is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
71 · Top 22%
vs
82 · Top 5%
Growth: O'Fallon is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
40 · Bottom 28%
vs
70 · Top 15%
Climate
70 · Bottom 49%
vs
70 · Bottom 49%
Physical resilience: Manchester is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
67 · Top 40%
vs
50 · Bottom 44%
Housing affordability: Manchester is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
84 · Top 6%
vs
80 · Top 12%
Schools: O'Fallon is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
50 · Top 50%
vs
86 · Top 6%
Access: Manchester is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 32%
vs
92 · Top 50%
Economic stability: O'Fallon is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
75 · Top 13%
vs
79 · Top 6%

Measured values

MetricManchesterO'FallonSource period
Population18,16093,8012024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$97,801 ±$19,572$110,443 ±$5,8492024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$50,108 ±$3,957$49,304 ±$1,3732024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,602/sq mi3,070/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$323,100$326,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,322 — more favorable$1,4432024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,543 — more favorable$1,570FY2026
Cost of living index95.095.02023
Homeownership rate75.0%81.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.1%3.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.5% — more favorable+0.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher62.4% — more favorable43.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate5.8% ±3%5.4% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)95754612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.05.8 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+25.3% — more favorable+7.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F90°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low22°F22°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation39.8"39.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport14 mi — more favorable19 miNASR current cycle
Average commute23.2 min — more favorable27.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.238.42024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher14.613.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency44.7%60.9% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency52.7%65.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Manchester

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

O'Fallon

Elevated or high exposure: hail, earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Manchester
—
Manchester: Your Score
67
Area Score
O'Fallon
—
O'Fallon: Your Score
74
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Manchester, MO · O'Fallon, MO · How this is calculated: methodology