Makaha vs Nanakuli

Which is the better fit for you?

Makaha, HI
51
Area Score
Bottom 22% nationally
Nanakuli, HI
52
Area Score
Bottom 25% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Nanakuli receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Makaha to Nanakuli

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 111.4 against 111.4 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $2,360 in Nanakuli against $2,360 in Makaha.
The median home
24% more
$488,600 in Nanakuli against $394,000 in Makaha.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 65°F in Nanakuli against 65°F in Makaha; July highs are 88°F against 88°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Makaha
Nanakuli
Opportunity: Nanakuli is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
67 · Top 29%
vs
68 · Top 27%
Growth
46 · Bottom 41%
vs
46 · Bottom 41%
Climate
89 · Top 8%
vs
89 · Top 8%
Physical resilience
21 · Bottom 15%
vs
21 · Bottom 15%
Housing affordability
31 · Bottom 4%
vs
31 · Bottom 4%
Schools
40 · Bottom 37%
vs
40 · Bottom 37%
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Nanakuli is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
20 · Bottom 3%
vs
37 · Bottom 17%

Measured values

MetricMakahaNanakuliSource period
Population10,06612,3832024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$64,970$86,597 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$28,021 ±$4,296$27,282 ±$2,2732024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,742/sq mi4,143/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$394,000$488,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,868 ±$253$1,690 ±$2132024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,360$2,360FY2026
Cost of living index111.4111.42023
Homeownership rate46.4%67.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.8%2.8%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.4%−0.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher19.7% — more favorable10.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate26.3% ±8%18.8% ±7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,6151,61512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.61.612 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+7.2%+7.2%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high88°F88°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low65°F65°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation13.9"13.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport8 mi8 miNASR current cycle
Average commute50.6 min39.1 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.936.72024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher14.314.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency44.2%44.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency57.6%57.6%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Makaha

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, wildfire, tsunami.

Nanakuli

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, wildfire, tsunami.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Makaha
—
Makaha: Your Score
51
Area Score
Nanakuli
—
Nanakuli: Your Score
52
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Makaha, HI · Nanakuli, HI · How this is calculated: methodology