Machesney Park vs Rockford

Which is the better fit for you?

Machesney Park, IL
57
Area Score
Bottom 43% nationally
Rockford, IL
48
Area Score
Bottom 14% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Machesney Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Machesney Park to Rockford

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 90.2 against 90.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,175 in Rockford against $1,175 in Machesney Park.
The median home
26% less
$129,000 in Rockford against $173,700 in Machesney Park.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 15°F in Rockford against 15°F in Machesney Park; July highs are 84°F against 84°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Machesney Park
Rockford
Opportunity: Machesney Park is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
50 · Bottom 38%
vs
39 · Bottom 16%
Growth: Machesney Park is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
49 · Bottom 48%
vs
45 · Bottom 38%
Climate
59 · Bottom 12%
vs
59 · Bottom 12%
Physical resilience
62 · Top 46%
vs
62 · Top 46%
Housing affordability: Machesney Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
78 · Top 17%
vs
69 · Top 44%
Schools: Machesney Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
43 · Bottom 41%
vs
12 · Bottom 5%
Access: Machesney Park is the more favorable of the two.
Access
69 · Bottom 11%
vs
65 · Bottom 8%
Economic stability: Machesney Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
51 · Bottom 38%
vs
32 · Bottom 12%

Measured values

MetricMachesney ParkRockfordSource period
Population22,630147,5212024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$75,489 — more favorable$54,7522024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$36,950 — more favorable$31,2632024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,784/sq mi2,259/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$173,700$129,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,102$985 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,175$1,175FY2026
Cost of living index90.290.22023
Homeownership rate79.6%54.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.4% — more favorable5.0%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)0.0%0.0%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher19.4%23.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate12.7% — more favorable20.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2414312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.1 — more favorable1.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+100.0%+27.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low15°F15°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation37.2"37.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport56 mi — more favorable62 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate23.1 min ±1.5 min23.3 min ±0.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.337.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools9452024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.2 — more favorable18.02024-25 school year
Math proficiency29.3% — more favorable15.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency31.8% — more favorable20.0%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility58.4%70.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Machesney Park

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Rockford

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Machesney Park
—
Machesney Park: Your Score
57
Area Score
Rockford
—
Rockford: Your Score
48
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Machesney Park, IL · Rockford, IL · How this is calculated: methodology