Lynn vs Clearfield

Which is the better fit for you?

Lynn, MA
54
Area Score
Bottom 34% nationally
Clearfield, UT
58
Area Score
Bottom 47% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Clearfield receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lynn to Clearfield

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
13% lower
Regional price level 96.1 against 110.4 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
27% less
$373,900 in Clearfield against $510,100 in Lynn.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F milder
Normal January lows are 21°F in Clearfield against 20°F in Lynn; July highs are 91°F against 82°F (summers 9°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

25 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Lynn
Clearfield
Opportunity: Clearfield is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
42 · Bottom 20%
vs
51 · Bottom 38%
Growth: Lynn is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
52 · Top 46%
vs
51 · Top 49%
Climate: Lynn is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
63 · Bottom 27%
vs
60 · Bottom 14%
Physical resilience: Clearfield is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
78 · Top 27%
vs
83 · Top 20%
Housing affordability: Clearfield is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
44 · Bottom 14%
vs
60 · Bottom 35%
Schools: Lynn is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
33 · Bottom 28%
vs
29 · Bottom 23%
Access
99 · Top 9%
vs
99 · Top 9%
Economic stability: Lynn is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
53 · Bottom 40%
vs
48 · Bottom 32%

Measured values

MetricLynnClearfieldSource period
Population101,70933,5232024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$75,043 ±$3,246$75,495 ±$6,3642024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$35,598 — more favorable$31,7582024 ACS 5-Year
Population density9,471/sq mi4,356/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$510,100$373,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,722$1,579 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index110.496.1 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate48.1%58.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.2%3.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.6%−1.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate24.1% ±1%23.2% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate14.0% ±2%13.0% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2294412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.3 — more favorable1.312 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+32.4%+91.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low20°F21°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation44.9"16.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport8 mi7 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute33.8 min23.8 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.530.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools28182024-25 school year
Students per teacher12.5 — more favorable22.22024-25 school year
Math proficiency40.6%42.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency40.3%44.6%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Massachusetts and Utah do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lynn

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, earthquake, hurricane.

Clearfield

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lynn
—
Lynn: Your Score
54
Area Score
Clearfield
—
Clearfield: Your Score
58
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lynn, MA · Clearfield, UT · How this is calculated: methodology