Lufkin vs Radford

Which is the better fit for you?

Lufkin, TX
55
Area Score
Bottom 36% nationally
Radford, VA
54
Area Score
Bottom 34% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Lufkin receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lufkin to Radford

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Lufkin, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$250 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,271 in Radford against $1,021 in Lufkin.
The median home
23% more
$220,700 in Radford against $179,600 in Lufkin.
The weather you would swap
Winters 15°F colder
Normal January lows are 23°F in Radford against 38°F in Lufkin; July highs are 84°F against 93°F (summers 9°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Lufkin
Radford
Opportunity: Radford is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
22 · Bottom 2%
vs
28 · Bottom 5%
Growth: Lufkin is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
56 · Top 37%
vs
43 · Bottom 33%
Climate: Lufkin is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
75 · Top 29%
vs
65 · Bottom 35%
Physical resilience: Radford is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
69 · Top 36%
vs
79 · Top 26%
Housing affordability: Lufkin is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
71 · Top 38%
vs
67 · Top 49%
Schools: Radford is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
61 · Top 35%
vs
62 · Top 34%
Access: Lufkin is the more favorable of the two.
Access
58 · Bottom 6%
vs
47 · Bottom 3%
Economic stability: Radford is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
34 · Bottom 14%
vs
39 · Bottom 20%

Measured values

MetricLufkinRadfordSource period
Population34,25116,7262024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$57,048 ±$5,717$57,348 ±$6,2432024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$28,636 ±$2,067$26,815 ±$2,7782024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,001/sq mi1,729/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$179,600$220,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,079 ±$49$1,033 ±$1062024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,021 — more favorable$1,271FY2026
Homeownership rate51.6%42.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.6%4.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.0% — more favorable−4.3%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher21.8%37.9% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate18.0% ±3%16.4% ±7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1111212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.2 — more favorable0.712 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+65.7%+140.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high93°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low38°F23°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation50.3"42.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport73 mi — more favorable78 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate18.7 min ±1.4 min19.6 min ±1.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.623.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools2772024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.912.8 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency55.0%86.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency45.3%80.1%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility74.3%78.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Texas and Virginia do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lufkin

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, tornado.

Radford

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lufkin
—
Lufkin: Your Score
55
Area Score
Radford
—
Radford: Your Score
54
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lufkin, TX · Radford, VA · How this is calculated: methodology