Lilburn vs Fredericksburg

Which is the better fit for you?

Lilburn, GA
66
Area Score
Top 27% nationally
Fredericksburg, TX
63
Area Score
Top 35% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Lilburn receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lilburn to Fredericksburg

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Fredericksburg, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$526 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,438 in Fredericksburg against $1,964 in Lilburn.
The median home
40% more
$460,300 in Fredericksburg against $329,700 in Lilburn.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F milder
Normal January lows are 34°F in Fredericksburg against 33°F in Lilburn; July highs are 93°F against 89°F (summers 4°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Lilburn
Fredericksburg
Opportunity: Lilburn is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
74 · Top 17%
vs
73 · Top 19%
Growth: Lilburn is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
64 · Top 23%
vs
57 · Top 36%
Climate: Lilburn is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
78 · Top 21%
vs
74 · Top 31%
Physical resilience: Fredericksburg is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
62 · Top 46%
vs
70 · Top 35%
Housing affordability: Lilburn is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
47 · Bottom 17%
vs
40 · Bottom 10%
Schools: Lilburn is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
67 · Top 28%
vs
60 · Top 36%
Access: Lilburn is the more favorable of the two.
Access
81 · Bottom 23%
vs
67 · Bottom 10%
Economic stability: Fredericksburg is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
40 · Bottom 21%
vs
47 · Bottom 30%

Measured values

MetricLilburnFredericksburgSource period
Population15,39011,4192024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$63,581 ±$9,062$64,534 ±$9,4152024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$27,669$48,942 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,281/sq mi1,195/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$329,700$460,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,778$1,386 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,964$1,438 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate61.4%63.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.0% — more favorable3.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.8% — more favorable+0.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher27.9%43.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate24.3% ±15%9.3% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)644612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.2 — more favorable4.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+6.7%−23.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F93°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low33°F34°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation51.4"30.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport24 mi — more favorable56 miNASR current cycle
Average commute35.0 min14.8 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age35.748.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1352024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.213.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency49.7%49.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency49.1%51.5%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility70.6%62.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Georgia and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lilburn

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Fredericksburg

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, hail, drought.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lilburn
—
Lilburn: Your Score
66
Area Score
Fredericksburg
—
Fredericksburg: Your Score
63
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lilburn, GA · Fredericksburg, TX · How this is calculated: methodology