Laurinburg vs Portsmouth

Which is the better fit for you?

Laurinburg, NC
48
Area Score
Bottom 13% nationally
Portsmouth, OH
46
Area Score
Bottom 11% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Laurinburg receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Laurinburg to Portsmouth

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Laurinburg or Portsmouth, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$48 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $973 in Portsmouth against $925 in Laurinburg.
The median home
23% less
$103,300 in Portsmouth against $134,200 in Laurinburg.
The weather you would swap
Winters 11°F colder
Normal January lows are 23°F in Portsmouth against 34°F in Laurinburg; July highs are 87°F against 92°F (summers 5°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Laurinburg
Portsmouth
Opportunity: Portsmouth is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
33 · Bottom 9%
vs
38 · Bottom 15%
Growth: Laurinburg is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
61 · Top 28%
vs
42 · Bottom 32%
Climate: Portsmouth is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
68 · Bottom 40%
vs
69 · Bottom 44%
Physical resilience: Laurinburg is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
47 · Bottom 40%
vs
44 · Bottom 34%
Housing affordability: Laurinburg is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
68 · Top 47%
vs
66 · Bottom 48%
Schools: Portsmouth is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
25 · Bottom 19%
vs
27 · Bottom 21%
Access: Portsmouth is the more favorable of the two.
Access
54 · Bottom 4%
vs
63 · Bottom 8%
Economic stability: Laurinburg is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
18 · Bottom 2%
vs
13 · Bottom 1%

Measured values

MetricLaurinburgPortsmouthSource period
Population15,08717,7282024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$42,170 — more favorable$34,7132024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$30,789 ±$6,042$26,847 ±$3,2922024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,202/sq mi1,652/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$134,200$103,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$774 ±$42$747 ±$1022024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$925 — more favorable$973FY2026
Homeownership rate46.6%48.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.9%4.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.0%−0.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate20.1% ±3%17.4% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate30.3% ±4%33.2% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)701012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.1 — more favorable0.612 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+48.9%+42.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high92°F87°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low34°F23°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation40.2"43.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport81 mi65 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate21.2 min ±1.6 min22.2 min ±2.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.439.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools7102024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.613.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency35.2%48.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency34.9%54.6%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility99.3%61.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

North Carolina and Ohio do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Laurinburg

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, earthquake.

Portsmouth

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Laurinburg
—
Laurinburg: Your Score
48
Area Score
Portsmouth
—
Portsmouth: Your Score
46
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Laurinburg, NC · Portsmouth, OH · How this is calculated: methodology