Lancaster vs Piqua

Which is the better fit for you?

Lancaster, OH
64
Area Score
Top 30% nationally
Piqua, OH
68
Area Score
Top 20% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Piqua receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lancaster to Piqua

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
2% lower
Regional price level 92.4 against 94.6 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$50 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,220 in Piqua against $1,170 in Lancaster.
The median home
29% less
$138,600 in Piqua against $193,900 in Lancaster.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 22°F in Piqua against 20°F in Lancaster; July highs are 86°F against 84°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

36 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Lancaster
Piqua
Opportunity: Piqua is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
65 · Top 32%
vs
70 · Top 24%
Growth: Piqua is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
58 · Top 33%
vs
65 · Top 21%
Climate: Piqua is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
63 · Bottom 29%
vs
68 · Bottom 41%
Physical resilience: Piqua is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
82 · Top 20%
vs
88 · Top 14%
Housing affordability: Lancaster is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
72 · Top 35%
vs
70 · Top 41%
Schools: Lancaster is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
36 · Bottom 33%
vs
35 · Bottom 31%
Access: Piqua is the more favorable of the two.
Access
94 · Top 45%
vs
95 · Top 40%
Economic stability: Lancaster is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
46 · Bottom 29%
vs
45 · Bottom 28%

Measured values

MetricLancasterPiquaSource period
Population41,24920,6462024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$59,133$67,796 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$34,001 ±$2,198$31,741 ±$1,9642024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,166/sq mi1,569/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$193,900$138,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,083$922 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,170 — more favorable$1,220FY2026
Cost of living index94.692.4 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate59.1%65.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.2%3.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.4%+0.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher21.9% — more favorable15.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate12.1% — more favorable17.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)22935712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents5.6 — more favorable3.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−67.8%+8.5%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F86°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low20°F22°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation40.3"41.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport18 mi17 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute29.2 min20.8 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.438.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1262024-25 school year
Students per teacher19.516.8 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency55.5% — more favorable54.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency64.9% — more favorable60.0%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lancaster

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Piqua

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lancaster
—
Lancaster: Your Score
64
Area Score
Piqua
—
Piqua: Your Score
68
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lancaster, OH · Piqua, OH · How this is calculated: methodology