Lancaster vs Los Angeles

Which is the better fit for you?

Lancaster, CA
32
Area Score
Bottom 1% nationally
Los Angeles, CA
46
Area Score
Bottom 11% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Los Angeles receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lancaster to Los Angeles

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 114.7 against 114.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$163 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,437 in Los Angeles against $2,275 in Lancaster.
The median home
106% more
$921,200 in Los Angeles against $446,600 in Lancaster.
The weather you would swap
Winters 18°F milder
Normal January lows are 49°F in Los Angeles against 31°F in Lancaster; July highs are 75°F against 98°F (summers 23°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Lancaster
Los Angeles
Opportunity: Los Angeles is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
31 · Bottom 7%
vs
41 · Bottom 20%
Growth: Los Angeles is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
20 · Bottom 5%
vs
57 · Top 34%
Climate: Los Angeles is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
60 · Bottom 13%
vs
100 · Top 4%
Physical resilience
11 · Bottom 7%
vs
11 · Bottom 7%
Housing affordability: Lancaster is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
45 · Bottom 15%
vs
30 · Bottom 3%
Schools: Los Angeles is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
2 · Bottom 1%
vs
32 · Bottom 28%
Access
100 · Top 2%
vs
100 · Top 3%
Economic stability: Los Angeles is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
38 · Bottom 19%
vs
46 · Bottom 29%

Measured values

MetricLancasterLos AngelesSource period
Population169,1693,857,2632024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$81,511 ±$3,094$81,939 ±$7422024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$31,046$47,685 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,794/sq mi8,198/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$446,600$921,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,764 — more favorable$1,9332024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,275 — more favorable$2,437FY2026
Cost of living index114.7114.72023
Homeownership rate60.4%36.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate7.1%5.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8%−1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher20.0%38.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate15.4% ±2%15.9% ±0.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)31317,63212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.94.6 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−68.5%+81.9% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high98°F75°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low31°F49°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation6.8"13.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport7 mi5 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute31.8 min — more favorable33.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.537.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools468132024-25 school year
Students per teacher24.019.8 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency16.5%35.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency35.6%48.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility75.6%79.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lancaster

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

Los Angeles

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lancaster
—
Lancaster: Your Score
32
Area Score
Los Angeles
—
Los Angeles: Your Score
46
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lancaster, CA · Los Angeles, CA · How this is calculated: methodology