Lake St. Louis vs Fulshear

Which is the better fit for you?

Lake St. Louis, MO
77
Area Score
Top 2% nationally
Fulshear, TX
73
Area Score
Top 7% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Lake St. Louis receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lake St. Louis to Fulshear

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
5% higher
Regional price level 99.7 against 95.0 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$620 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,190 in Fulshear against $1,570 in Lake St. Louis.
The median home
41% more
$572,700 in Fulshear against $405,900 in Lake St. Louis.
The weather you would swap
Winters 23°F milder
Normal January lows are 45°F in Fulshear against 22°F in Lake St. Louis; July highs are 95°F against 90°F (summers 5°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

33 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Lake St. Louis
Fulshear
Opportunity: Lake St. Louis is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
83 · Top 4%
vs
75 · Top 16%
Growth: Lake St. Louis is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
82 · Top 3%
vs
73 · Top 12%
Climate: Fulshear is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
70 · Bottom 49%
vs
73 · Top 38%
Physical resilience: Lake St. Louis is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
50 · Bottom 44%
vs
45 · Bottom 35%
Housing affordability: Fulshear is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
89 · Top 2%
vs
91 · Top 2%
Schools: Lake St. Louis is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
87 · Top 5%
vs
79 · Top 13%
Access: Fulshear is the more favorable of the two.
Access
90 · Bottom 41%
vs
95 · Top 38%
Economic stability: Fulshear is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
74 · Top 15%
vs
76 · Top 11%

Measured values

MetricLake St. LouisFulshearSource period
Population18,06634,8682024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$125,693$187,035 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$62,954 ±$5,079$65,628 ±$7,7772024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,113/sq mi2,698/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$405,900$572,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,588 ±$138$1,952 ±$1,5172024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,570 — more favorable$2,190FY2026
Cost of living index95.0 — more favorable99.72023
Homeownership rate75.6%90.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.3% — more favorable4.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.4% — more favorable+0.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher51.7%74.8% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate4.1%1.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2592,29312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents14.365.8 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+1077.3%−39.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F95°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low22°F45°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation39.8"49.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport22 mi15 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute26.7 min — more favorable40.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age42.736.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools472024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.2 — more favorable19.02024-25 school year
Math proficiency63.0%68.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency71.0%70.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility12.7%22.8%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Missouri and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lake St. Louis

Elevated or high exposure: hail, earthquake, inland flooding.

Fulshear

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lake St. Louis
—
Lake St. Louis: Your Score
77
Area Score
Fulshear
—
Fulshear: Your Score
73
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lake St. Louis, MO · Fulshear, TX · How this is calculated: methodology