Lacey vs Olympia

Which is the better fit for you?

Lacey, WA
60
Area Score
Top 46% nationally
Olympia, WA
60
Area Score
Top 47% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Lacey and Olympia receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lacey to Olympia

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 106.4 against 106.4 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,960 in Olympia against $1,960 in Lacey.
The median home
6% more
$486,200 in Olympia against $457,100 in Lacey.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 33°F in Olympia against 33°F in Lacey; July highs are 78°F against 78°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Lacey
Olympia
Opportunity: Olympia is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
75 · Top 16%
vs
79 · Top 10%
Growth: Lacey is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
84 · Top 3%
vs
51 · Top 50%
Climate
69 · Bottom 44%
vs
69 · Bottom 44%
Physical resilience
32 · Bottom 25%
vs
32 · Bottom 25%
Housing affordability: Lacey is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
54 · Bottom 26%
vs
50 · Bottom 21%
Schools: Olympia is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
39 · Bottom 36%
vs
68 · Top 26%
Access: Lacey is the more favorable of the two.
Access
78 · Bottom 19%
vs
76 · Bottom 17%
Economic stability
52 · Bottom 39%
vs
52 · Bottom 40%

Measured values

MetricLaceyOlympiaSource period
Population57,73755,9512024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$90,625 — more favorable$81,3022024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$42,173$45,674 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,110/sq mi3,071/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$457,100$486,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,870$1,599 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,960$1,960FY2026
Cost of living index106.4106.42023
Homeownership rate55.9%49.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.7%3.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.6%+0.6%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher34.1%51.8% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.6% ±2%13.5% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)78821712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents13.6 — more favorable3.912 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+141.0%−26.2%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high78°F78°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low33°F33°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation50.6"50.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport36 mi — more favorable39 miNASR current cycle
Average commute27.6 min21.6 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.340.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools16142024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.3 — more favorable17.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency49.1%59.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency60.9%72.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility50.0%42.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lacey

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Olympia

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lacey
—
Lacey: Your Score
60
Area Score
Olympia
—
Olympia: Your Score
60
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lacey, WA · Olympia, WA · How this is calculated: methodology