La Crosse vs Onalaska

Which is the better fit for you?

La Crosse, WI
64
Area Score
Top 31% nationally
Onalaska, WI
76
Area Score
Top 3% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Onalaska receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from La Crosse to Onalaska

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 90.6 against 90.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,166 in Onalaska against $1,166 in La Crosse.
The median home
38% more
$288,900 in Onalaska against $210,100 in La Crosse.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 11°F in Onalaska against 11°F in La Crosse; July highs are 85°F against 85°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

La Crosse
Onalaska
Opportunity: Onalaska is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
68 · Top 26%
vs
82 · Top 5%
Growth: Onalaska is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
32 · Bottom 17%
vs
53 · Top 44%
Climate
56 · Bottom 7%
vs
56 · Bottom 7%
Physical resilience
92 · Top 10%
vs
92 · Top 10%
Housing affordability: Onalaska is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
75 · Top 25%
vs
82 · Top 9%
Schools: Onalaska is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
40 · Bottom 37%
vs
72 · Top 22%
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Onalaska is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
57 · Bottom 47%
vs
78 · Top 7%

Measured values

MetricLa CrosseOnalaskaSource period
Population51,35619,3482024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$55,866$85,867 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$34,439$52,580 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,366/sq mi1,823/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$210,100$288,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,010 — more favorable$1,1302024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,166$1,166FY2026
Cost of living index90.690.62023
Homeownership rate46.1%63.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.5%3.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.8%+1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher34.9%41.7% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate12.7%5.0% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)157912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.34.1 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+50.0%−33.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low11°F11°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation35.2"35.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport4 mi3 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate17.3 min ±0.8 min18.5 min ±1.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age30.540.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1862024-25 school year
Students per teacher11.0 — more favorable14.02024-25 school year
Math proficiency35.2%51.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency38.5%49.9% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility48.0%32.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

La Crosse

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Onalaska

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

La Crosse
—
La Crosse: Your Score
64
Area Score
Onalaska
—
Onalaska: Your Score
76
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: La Crosse, WI · Onalaska, WI · How this is calculated: methodology