Kingman vs Yuma

Which is the better fit for you?

Kingman, AZ
41
Area Score
Bottom 4% nationally
Yuma, AZ
46
Area Score
Bottom 11% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Yuma receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Kingman to Yuma

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
3% lower
Regional price level 88.1 against 90.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$17 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,382 in Yuma against $1,365 in Kingman.
The median home
14% less
$230,000 in Yuma against $267,700 in Kingman.
The weather you would swap
Winters 17°F milder
Normal January lows are 48°F in Yuma against 31°F in Kingman; July highs are 107°F against 99°F (summers 8°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

30 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Kingman
Yuma
Opportunity: Yuma is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
20 · Bottom 1%
vs
29 · Bottom 5%
Growth: Yuma is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
58 · Top 33%
vs
75 · Top 9%
Climate: Yuma is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
58 · Bottom 10%
vs
59 · Bottom 12%
Physical resilience: Kingman is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
21 · Bottom 16%
vs
20 · Bottom 13%
Housing affordability: Yuma is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
67 · Top 48%
vs
71 · Top 38%
Schools: Yuma is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
25 · Bottom 19%
vs
29 · Bottom 24%
Access: Yuma is the more favorable of the two.
Access
83 · Bottom 26%
vs
90 · Bottom 40%
Economic stability: Yuma is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
45 · Bottom 27%
vs
46 · Bottom 29%

Measured values

MetricKingmanYumaSource period
Population34,375100,1392024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$61,792 ±$4,964$65,482 ±$3,3942024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$34,866 ±$2,658$33,951 ±$1,7122024 ACS 5-Year
Population density916/sq mi827/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$267,700$230,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,058 ±$72$1,114 ±$502024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,365 — more favorable$1,382FY2026
Cost of living index90.588.1 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate68.4%66.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate6.0% — more favorable13.1%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−5.4%−3.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate20.0% ±3%20.9% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate13.3% ±3%15.1% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)16976812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.97.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−1.2%0.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high99°F107°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low31°F48°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation8.0"3.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport31 mi11 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate19.2 min ±1.5 min19.7 min ±0.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age43.033.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools17502024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.221.0 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency36.4%37.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency37.9%38.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

6 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Kingman

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, inland flooding.

Yuma

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, heat wave.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Kingman
—
Kingman: Your Score
41
Area Score
Yuma
—
Yuma: Your Score
46
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Kingman, AZ · Yuma, AZ · How this is calculated: methodology