Irving vs Casper

Which is the better fit for you?

Irving, TX
59
Area Score
Top 50% nationally
Casper, WY
57
Area Score
Bottom 42% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Irving receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Irving to Casper

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
10% lower
Regional price level 92.5 against 102.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$681 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,082 in Casper against $1,763 in Irving.
The median home
17% less
$260,400 in Casper against $315,600 in Irving.
The weather you would swap
Winters 21°F colder
Normal January lows are 15°F in Casper against 36°F in Irving; July highs are 89°F against 96°F (summers 7°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

26 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Irving
Casper
Opportunity: Irving is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
66 · Top 29%
vs
62 · Top 38%
Growth: Irving is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
27 · Bottom 11%
vs
22 · Bottom 6%
Climate: Irving is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
68 · Bottom 43%
vs
55 · Bottom 4%
Physical resilience
52 · Bottom 45%
vs
52 · Bottom 45%
Housing affordability
77 · Top 20%
vs
77 · Top 21%
Access: Irving is the more favorable of the two.
Access
100 · Top 4%
vs
90 · Bottom 42%
Economic stability: Casper is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
56 · Bottom 46%
vs
57 · Bottom 49%

Measured values

MetricIrvingCasperSource period
Population256,49258,8392024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$81,830 — more favorable$70,2182024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$40,642 ±$1,074$42,613 ±$2,7732024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,829/sq mi2,199/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$315,600$260,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,619$1,009 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,763$1,082 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.592.5 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate38.1%69.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.2%2.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.2% — more favorable−1.0%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher42.4% — more favorable30.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.5% ±1%10.0% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)876012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.31.0 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−41.2%−65.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high96°F89°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low36°F15°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation37.0"12.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport5 mi — more favorable8 miNASR current cycle
Average commute26.0 min17.8 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age32.837.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools56182024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.914.1 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency49.6%46.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency41.8%52.7%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility72.8%42.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Texas and Wyoming do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Irving

Elevated or high exposure: hail, tornado.

Casper

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Irving
—
Irving: Your Score
59
Area Score
Casper
—
Casper: Your Score
57
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Irving, TX · Casper, WY · How this is calculated: methodology