Hutchinson vs New Ulm

Which is the better fit for you?

Hutchinson, MN
63
Area Score
Top 36% nationally
New Ulm, MN
64
Area Score
Top 33% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

New Ulm receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Hutchinson to New Ulm

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Hutchinson or New Ulm, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$26 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $973 in New Ulm against $999 in Hutchinson.
The median home
11% less
$204,200 in New Ulm against $229,600 in Hutchinson.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 7°F in New Ulm against 5°F in Hutchinson; July highs are 82°F against 83°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Hutchinson
New Ulm
Opportunity: New Ulm is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
41 · Bottom 20%
vs
52 · Bottom 42%
Growth
77 · Top 7%
vs
77 · Top 7%
Climate: New Ulm is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
52 · Bottom 2%
vs
54 · Bottom 3%
Physical resilience: Hutchinson is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
88 · Top 14%
vs
80 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Hutchinson is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
80 · Top 14%
vs
76 · Top 22%
Schools: New Ulm is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
49 · Bottom 48%
vs
50 · Top 50%
Access: Hutchinson is the more favorable of the two.
Access
61 · Bottom 6%
vs
50 · Bottom 4%
Economic stability: New Ulm is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
57 · Bottom 48%
vs
66 · Top 34%

Measured values

MetricHutchinsonNew UlmSource period
Population14,68014,0562024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$72,836 — more favorable$64,4492024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$44,845 — more favorable$35,9782024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,731/sq mi1,383/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$229,600$204,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$940 ±$49$962 ±$712024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$999$973 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate68.6%75.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.7%4.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.0%−1.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate26.1% ±3%27.9% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate12.7%9.2% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)23613412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents16.1 — more favorable9.512 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+1080.0%+570.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low5°F7°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation29.8"31.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport57 mi — more favorable73 miNASR current cycle
Average commute20.7 min13.5 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.939.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools12122024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.2 — more favorable14.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency51.2%56.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency61.0% — more favorable57.1%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility35.3%32.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Hutchinson

Elevated or high exposure: tornado.

New Ulm

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Hutchinson
—
Hutchinson: Your Score
63
Area Score
New Ulm
—
New Ulm: Your Score
64
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Hutchinson, MN · New Ulm, MN · How this is calculated: methodology