Hutchinson vs Ponca City

Which is the better fit for you?

Hutchinson, KS
49
Area Score
Bottom 17% nationally
Ponca City, OK
51
Area Score
Bottom 23% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Ponca City receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Hutchinson to Ponca City

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Hutchinson or Ponca City, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$17 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $940 in Ponca City against $957 in Hutchinson.
The median home
9% more
$135,800 in Ponca City against $125,000 in Hutchinson.
The weather you would swap
Winters 5°F milder
Normal January lows are 25°F in Ponca City against 20°F in Hutchinson; July highs are 93°F against 93°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Hutchinson
Ponca City
Opportunity
38 · Bottom 14%
vs
38 · Bottom 15%
Growth: Ponca City is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
35 · Bottom 22%
vs
48 · Bottom 44%
Climate: Hutchinson is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
61 · Bottom 17%
vs
60 · Bottom 14%
Physical resilience: Ponca City is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
46 · Bottom 37%
vs
47 · Bottom 38%
Housing affordability: Ponca City is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
78 · Top 18%
vs
82 · Top 9%
Schools: Ponca City is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
37 · Bottom 34%
vs
38 · Bottom 34%
Access
76 · Bottom 17%
vs
76 · Bottom 16%
Economic stability: Hutchinson is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
39 · Bottom 20%
vs
29 · Bottom 9%

Measured values

MetricHutchinsonPonca CitySource period
Population39,70924,3262024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$58,687 ±$3,289$55,941 ±$4,1372024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$30,596 ±$1,488$29,992 ±$1,6562024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,562/sq mi1,324/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$125,000$135,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$881 ±$29$850 ±$362024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$957$940 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate62.6%62.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.6%4.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.2% — more favorable−2.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate19.3% ±2%20.6% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate13.9% — more favorable17.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)131912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.30.8 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−7.1%+11.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high93°F93°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low20°F25°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation28.3"33.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport39 mi — more favorable47 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate16.9 min ±0.9 min16.2 min ±0.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.437.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools14132024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.3 — more favorable17.42024-25 school year
Math proficiency25.0%34.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency29.1%32.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility62.1%77.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Kansas and Oklahoma do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Hutchinson

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, strong wind, wildfire.

Ponca City

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, wildfire, drought.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Hutchinson
—
Hutchinson: Your Score
49
Area Score
Ponca City
—
Ponca City: Your Score
51
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Hutchinson, KS · Ponca City, OK · How this is calculated: methodology