Huntersville vs Matthews

Which is the better fit for you?

Huntersville, NC
66
Area Score
Top 26% nationally
Matthews, NC
66
Area Score
Top 27% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Huntersville and Matthews receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Huntersville to Matthews

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 97.3 against 97.3 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$49 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,040 in Matthews against $2,089 in Huntersville.
The median home
6% less
$445,100 in Matthews against $472,900 in Huntersville.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 32°F in Matthews against 32°F in Huntersville; July highs are 91°F against 90°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Huntersville
Matthews
Opportunity: Huntersville is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
69 · Top 26%
vs
66 · Top 30%
Growth: Huntersville is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
47 · Bottom 42%
vs
46 · Bottom 42%
Climate: Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 39%
vs
76 · Top 26%
Physical resilience
50 · Bottom 44%
vs
50 · Bottom 43%
Housing affordability: Huntersville is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
76 · Top 23%
vs
71 · Top 36%
Schools: Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
69 · Top 26%
vs
73 · Top 20%
Access: Huntersville is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 36%
vs
95 · Top 39%
Economic stability: Huntersville is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
81 · Top 3%
vs
75 · Top 12%

Measured values

MetricHuntersvilleMatthewsSource period
Population63,96930,5772024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$120,516 — more favorable$108,6112024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$61,224 — more favorable$53,2652024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,529/sq mi1,787/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$472,900$445,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,834 ±$62$1,764 ±$422024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,089$2,040 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index97.397.32023
Homeownership rate71.7%64.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.2% — more favorable3.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8%−1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate57.5% ±3%55.2% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate3.1% ±0.6%3.7% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5,0255,02512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.44.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−51.3%−51.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low32°F32°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation43.6"37.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport14 mi — more favorable15 miNASR current cycle
Average commute28.8 min26.9 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.140.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1692024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.1 — more favorable18.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency53.7%64.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency54.8%57.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility67.0%53.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Huntersville

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Matthews

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Huntersville
—
Huntersville: Your Score
66
Area Score
Matthews
—
Matthews: Your Score
66
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Huntersville, NC · Matthews, NC · How this is calculated: methodology