Hobbs vs Harlingen

Which is the better fit for you?

Hobbs, NM
48
Area Score
Bottom 13% nationally
Harlingen, TX
50
Area Score
Bottom 20% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Harlingen receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Hobbs to Harlingen

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Hobbs, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$277 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,047 in Harlingen against $1,324 in Hobbs.
The median home
27% less
$140,600 in Harlingen against $191,300 in Hobbs.
The weather you would swap
Winters 20°F milder
Normal January lows are 50°F in Harlingen against 30°F in Hobbs; July highs are 96°F against 94°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Hobbs
Harlingen
Opportunity: Hobbs is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
41 · Bottom 19%
vs
35 · Bottom 10%
Growth: Harlingen is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
58 · Top 34%
vs
61 · Top 28%
Climate: Harlingen is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
66 · Bottom 37%
vs
71 · Top 44%
Physical resilience: Harlingen is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
9 · Bottom 4%
vs
21 · Bottom 15%
Housing affordability
75 · Top 25%
vs
75 · Top 24%
Schools: Harlingen is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
40 · Bottom 37%
vs
45 · Bottom 44%
Access: Hobbs is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
90 · Bottom 42%
Economic stability: Harlingen is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
29 · Bottom 9%
vs
31 · Bottom 11%

Measured values

MetricHobbsHarlingenSource period
Population40,25272,0872024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$64,021 — more favorable$53,6452024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$32,862 — more favorable$26,5122024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,524/sq mi1,790/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$191,300$140,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,112$928 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,324$1,047 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate66.0%56.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.8% — more favorable6.2%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.2%−0.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher17.3%22.6% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate19.1% — more favorable24.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)13333612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.34.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+14.7%−0.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F96°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low30°F50°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation13.8"24.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport4 mi4 miNASR current cycle
Average commute23.7 min19.5 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age32.533.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools19332024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.914.7 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency19.8%50.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency32.0%40.3%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility64.5%77.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

New Mexico and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Hobbs

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, hail, inland flooding.

Harlingen

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Hobbs
—
Hobbs: Your Score
48
Area Score
Harlingen
—
Harlingen: Your Score
50
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Hobbs, NM · Harlingen, TX · How this is calculated: methodology