Greenwich vs Oatfield

Which is the better fit for you?

Greenwich, CT
51
Area Score
Bottom 23% nationally
Oatfield, OR
55
Area Score
Bottom 35% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Oatfield receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Greenwich to Oatfield

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 106.7 against 107.0 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
62% less
$569,000 in Oatfield against $1,515,700 in Greenwich.
The weather you would swap
Winters 14°F milder
Normal January lows are 36°F in Oatfield against 22°F in Greenwich; July highs are 82°F against 83°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

29 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Greenwich
Oatfield
Opportunity: Oatfield is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
42 · Bottom 21%
vs
51 · Bottom 39%
Growth: Oatfield is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
48 · Bottom 45%
vs
49 · Bottom 47%
Climate: Oatfield is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
65 · Bottom 34%
vs
78 · Top 22%
Physical resilience: Oatfield is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
32 · Bottom 25%
vs
48 · Bottom 40%
Housing affordability: Greenwich is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
29 · Bottom 3%
vs
22 · Bottom 1%
Schools: Greenwich is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
91 · Top 3%
vs
68 · Top 26%
Access: Oatfield is the more favorable of the two.
Access
88 · Bottom 34%
vs
93 · Top 47%
Economic stability: Oatfield is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
43 · Bottom 26%
vs
58 · Top 50%

Measured values

MetricGreenwichOatfieldSource period
Population14,79213,2942024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$134,914 — more favorable$103,2242024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$125,748 — more favorable$47,6702024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,055/sq mi3,916/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$1,515,700$569,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$2,082 ±$349$1,786 ±$3182024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index107.0106.7 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate54.1%85.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.0%5.0%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−4.2%−0.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher70.3% — more favorable35.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.9% ±4%10.3% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2,2541,19612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.6 — more favorable2.812 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+7.8%+18.2% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low22°F36°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation47.8"36.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport28 mi12 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate30.0 min ±3.1 min28.2 min ±2.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age43.950.32024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher11.1 — more favorable19.22024-25 school year
Math proficiency62.7%47.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency76.3%64.9%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Connecticut and Oregon do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Greenwich

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, hurricane.

Oatfield

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, heat wave.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Greenwich
—
Greenwich: Your Score
51
Area Score
Oatfield
—
Oatfield: Your Score
55
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Greenwich, CT · Oatfield, OR · How this is calculated: methodology