Glen Carbon vs O'Fallon

Which is the better fit for you?

Glen Carbon, IL
67
Area Score
Top 21% nationally
O'Fallon, MO
74
Area Score
Top 5% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

O'Fallon receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Glen Carbon to O'Fallon

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 95.0 against 95.0 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$230 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,570 in O'Fallon against $1,340 in Glen Carbon.
The median home
16% more
$326,200 in O'Fallon against $282,000 in Glen Carbon.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F colder
Normal January lows are 22°F in O'Fallon against 24°F in Glen Carbon; July highs are 90°F against 89°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Glen Carbon
O'Fallon
Opportunity: O'Fallon is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
76 · Top 13%
vs
82 · Top 5%
Growth: O'Fallon is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
55 · Top 40%
vs
70 · Top 15%
Climate: Glen Carbon is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 40%
vs
70 · Bottom 49%
Physical resilience: Glen Carbon is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
60 · Top 48%
vs
50 · Bottom 44%
Housing affordability: Glen Carbon is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
81 · Top 10%
vs
80 · Top 12%
Schools: O'Fallon is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
41 · Bottom 39%
vs
86 · Top 6%
Access: Glen Carbon is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
92 · Top 50%
Economic stability: O'Fallon is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
77 · Top 9%
vs
79 · Top 6%

Measured values

MetricGlen CarbonO'FallonSource period
Population13,97793,8012024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$97,168$110,443 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$51,575 ±$3,789$49,304 ±$1,3732024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,353/sq mi3,070/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$282,000$326,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,097 — more favorable$1,4432024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,340 — more favorable$1,570FY2026
Cost of living index95.095.02023
Homeownership rate69.2%81.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.5%3.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.8% — more favorable+0.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher50.8% — more favorable43.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate4.9% ±3%5.4% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)3354612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.45.8 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+43.5%+7.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F90°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low24°F22°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation40.8"39.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport10 mi — more favorable19 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate28.4 min ±2.2 min27.1 min ±0.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.438.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools2232024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.313.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency31.5%60.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency34.5%65.7%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility18.5%18.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Illinois and Missouri do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Glen Carbon

Elevated or high exposure: hail, earthquake.

O'Fallon

Elevated or high exposure: hail, earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Glen Carbon
—
Glen Carbon: Your Score
67
Area Score
O'Fallon
—
O'Fallon: Your Score
74
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Glen Carbon, IL · O'Fallon, MO · How this is calculated: methodology