Gig Harbor vs Tacoma

Which is the better fit for you?

Gig Harbor, WA
54
Area Score
Bottom 33% nationally
Tacoma, WA
51
Area Score
Bottom 23% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Gig Harbor receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Gig Harbor to Tacoma

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.7 against 112.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$449 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,420 in Tacoma against $1,971 in Gig Harbor.
The median home
37% less
$479,600 in Tacoma against $767,100 in Gig Harbor.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 36°F in Tacoma against 36°F in Gig Harbor; July highs are 76°F against 76°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Gig Harbor
Tacoma
Opportunity: Gig Harbor is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
52 · Bottom 40%
vs
47 · Bottom 32%
Growth: Gig Harbor is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
82 · Top 4%
vs
72 · Top 12%
Climate
74 · Top 35%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience
32 · Bottom 25%
vs
32 · Bottom 26%
Housing affordability: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
37 · Bottom 8%
vs
53 · Bottom 25%
Schools: Gig Harbor is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
37 · Bottom 34%
vs
18 · Bottom 9%
Access
91 · Bottom 45%
vs
91 · Bottom 46%
Economic stability: Gig Harbor is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
63 · Top 39%
vs
53 · Bottom 41%

Measured values

MetricGig HarborTacomaSource period
Population12,424222,7582024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$118,395 — more favorable$85,8842024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$66,028 — more favorable$45,6502024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,105/sq mi4,480/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$767,100$479,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,301$1,676 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,971 — more favorable$2,420FY2026
Cost of living index112.7112.72023
Homeownership rate62.2%55.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.4%5.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.1%−1.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher52.1% — more favorable34.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate6.7% — more favorable12.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1051,26712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents8.5 — more favorable5.712 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+1066.7%+155.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high76°F76°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low36°F36°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation42.0"42.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport16 mi15 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate32.5 min ±3.3 min30.6 min ±0.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age46.637.22024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher18.5 — more favorable18.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency48.5% — more favorable38.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency63.4% — more favorable55.3%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Gig Harbor

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Tacoma

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Gig Harbor
—
Gig Harbor: Your Score
54
Area Score
Tacoma
—
Tacoma: Your Score
51
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Gig Harbor, WA · Tacoma, WA · How this is calculated: methodology