Garner vs Boiling Springs

Which is the better fit for you?

Garner, NC
66
Area Score
Top 26% nationally
Boiling Springs, SC
68
Area Score
Top 18% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Boiling Springs receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Garner to Boiling Springs

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
8% lower
Regional price level 90.5 against 98.4 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$353 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,187 in Boiling Springs against $1,540 in Garner.
The median home
31% less
$244,400 in Boiling Springs against $355,000 in Garner.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 32°F in Boiling Springs against 32°F in Garner; July highs are 90°F against 91°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

27 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Garner
Boiling Springs
Opportunity: Garner is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
73 · Top 19%
vs
71 · Top 23%
Growth: Boiling Springs is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
78 · Top 6%
vs
82 · Top 3%
Climate: Boiling Springs is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 43%
vs
76 · Top 25%
Physical resilience
69 · Top 36%
vs
69 · Top 36%
Housing affordability: Boiling Springs is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
65 · Bottom 46%
vs
83 · Top 8%
Schools: Garner is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
24 · Bottom 17%
vs
20 · Bottom 13%
Access: Garner is the more favorable of the two.
Access
93 · Top 48%
vs
85 · Bottom 29%
Economic stability: Boiling Springs is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
56 · Bottom 46%
vs
70 · Top 25%

Measured values

MetricGarnerBoiling SpringsSource period
Population34,47312,9362024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$78,756 ±$8,951$72,068 ±$16,2862024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$44,201 — more favorable$36,4462024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,747/sq mi1,892/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$355,000$244,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,549$1,266 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,540$1,187 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index98.490.5 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate63.2%74.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.6% — more favorable4.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.1%+4.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher46.5% — more favorable26.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate7.4% ±2%10.2% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,1584,23212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents33.6 — more favorable12.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−20.4%+11.0% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high91°F90°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low32°F32°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation46.1"49.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport16 mi — more favorable30 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate28.5 min ±1.6 min27.1 min ±2.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.733.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1452024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.5 — more favorable16.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency34.5%44.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency38.9%42.4%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

North Carolina and South Carolina do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Garner

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Boiling Springs

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, cold wave, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Garner
—
Garner: Your Score
66
Area Score
Boiling Springs
—
Boiling Springs: Your Score
68
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Garner, NC · Boiling Springs, SC · How this is calculated: methodology