Fruita vs Grand Junction

Which is the better fit for you?

Fruita, CO
59
Area Score
Bottom 49% nationally
Grand Junction, CO
56
Area Score
Bottom 39% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Fruita receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fruita to Grand Junction

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 92.8 against 92.8 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,249 in Grand Junction against $1,249 in Fruita.
The median home
2% less
$389,800 in Grand Junction against $398,200 in Fruita.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 17°F in Grand Junction against 17°F in Fruita; July highs are 95°F against 95°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Fruita
Grand Junction
Opportunity: Fruita is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
48 · Bottom 32%
vs
47 · Bottom 31%
Growth: Grand Junction is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
48 · Bottom 45%
vs
56 · Top 37%
Climate
53 · Bottom 2%
vs
53 · Bottom 2%
Physical resilience
78 · Top 26%
vs
78 · Top 26%
Housing affordability: Fruita is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
63 · Bottom 42%
vs
61 · Bottom 39%
Schools: Fruita is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
43 · Bottom 42%
vs
21 · Bottom 14%
Access: Grand Junction is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 34%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability: Fruita is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
74 · Top 15%
vs
57 · Bottom 48%

Measured values

MetricFruitaGrand JunctionSource period
Population13,69168,1422024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$87,184 — more favorable$70,0802024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$40,059 ±$3,119$41,208 ±$1,6202024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,709/sq mi1,672/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$398,200$389,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,472 ±$340$1,142 ±$572024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,249$1,249FY2026
Cost of living index92.892.82023
Homeownership rate79.9%63.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.3%4.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.8%−2.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate33.6% ±4%38.1% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate4.5% — more favorable10.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)8681312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents6.3 — more favorable5.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−49.7%−10.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high95°F95°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low17°F17°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation9.1"9.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport11 mi3 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute21.5 min17.3 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.540.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools6252024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.516.6 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency31.2% — more favorable24.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency51.4% — more favorable40.9%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility34.1%59.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fruita

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake.

Grand Junction

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fruita
—
Fruita: Your Score
59
Area Score
Grand Junction
—
Grand Junction: Your Score
56
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fruita, CO · Grand Junction, CO · How this is calculated: methodology