Fort Smith vs Van Buren

Which is the better fit for you?

Fort Smith, AR
61
Area Score
Top 42% nationally
Van Buren, AR
55
Area Score
Bottom 35% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Fort Smith receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fort Smith to Van Buren

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 85.3 against 85.3 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $937 in Van Buren against $937 in Fort Smith.
The median home
2% more
$181,500 in Van Buren against $178,100 in Fort Smith.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 30°F in Van Buren against 30°F in Fort Smith; July highs are 94°F against 94°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Fort Smith
Van Buren
Opportunity: Fort Smith is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
57 · Top 48%
vs
54 · Bottom 46%
Growth: Fort Smith is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
55 · Top 39%
vs
40 · Bottom 28%
Climate
63 · Bottom 26%
vs
63 · Bottom 26%
Physical resilience: Fort Smith is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
58 · Top 50%
vs
38 · Bottom 30%
Housing affordability: Fort Smith is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
83 · Top 8%
vs
80 · Top 14%
Schools: Fort Smith is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
50 · Top 50%
vs
48 · Bottom 48%
Access
95 · Top 42%
vs
95 · Top 42%
Economic stability: Van Buren is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
36 · Bottom 17%
vs
40 · Bottom 21%

Measured values

MetricFort SmithVan BurenSource period
Population89,80523,7632024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$54,816$61,149 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$34,413 — more favorable$29,3982024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,399/sq mi1,535/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$178,100$181,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$884 ±$32$847 ±$282024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$937$937FY2026
Cost of living index85.385.32023
Homeownership rate53.4%65.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.2% — more favorable4.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.0%+1.0%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate23.9% ±2%20.9% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate18.1% ±2%15.9% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)3593112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.0 — more favorable1.312 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−10.5%−29.5%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F94°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low30°F30°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation47.3"47.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport1 mi — more favorable8 miNASR current cycle
Average commute18.1 min — more favorable21.2 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.536.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools26102024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.8 — more favorable14.82024-25 school year
Math proficiency42.5%46.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency45.3% — more favorable43.6%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility72.8%64.8%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fort Smith

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm.

Van Buren

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, wildfire.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fort Smith
—
Fort Smith: Your Score
61
Area Score
Van Buren
—
Van Buren: Your Score
55
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fort Smith, AR · Van Buren, AR · How this is calculated: methodology